Why Uganda could face action from the Commonwealth over post-election abuses
Uganda is facing possible scrutiny from the Commonwealth after an international law firm representing opposition leader Robert Kyagulanyi, popularly known as Bobi Wine, petitioned the bloc over alleged post-election human rights abuses.
In a statement, Amsterdam & Partners LLP said it has submitted a formal dossier to the Commonwealth Secretariat, asking that Uganda be referred to the Commonwealth Ministerial Action Group (CMAG). CMAG is responsible for addressing serious or persistent violations of the Commonwealth’s core values.
The lawyers argued that Uganda breached the Commonwealth Charter and the Harare Declaration, which commit member states to democratic governance, respect for human rights, the rule of law and free political participation.
Allegations linked to the election
The petition centres on Uganda’s January 15, 2026, general election and its aftermath. According to the lawyers, the period was marked by mass arrests of opposition supporters, the use of force against civilians, restrictions on communications and sustained pressure on opposition leaders.
Several members of Bobi Wine’s National Unity Platform (NUP) were arrested during the campaign and around election day. Many were detained at roadblocks or during raids on party offices, while others were charged with offences such as inciting violence. The party says many of those arrested were its polling agents.
There are also reports that hundreds of people were detained after the election. The Ugandan military has said the arrests were based on violations of the law and denies that they were politically motivated.
Threats against the opposition
A major concern raised in the submission is public statements made by Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces, who is also President Yoweri Museveni’s son.
In posts on social media, Gen Muhoozi claimed that the army had killed supporters of Bobi Wine and said the opposition leader would be “next.” Bobi Wine has said the military invaded his home during this period and that his family was left feeling unsafe. The army has denied occupying his residence.
The lawyers further argued that such statements amount to credible threats and that the Ugandan state has a duty under both domestic and international law to protect political opponents.
This story is written and edited by the Global South World team, you can contact us here.
