CGTP Secretary General Geronimo Lopez warned that workers would not accept reforms that undermine labour protections, while highlighting the gap between the minimum wage and the cost of living. Union representatives also raised concerns over possible cuts to benefits such as bonuses and Compensation for Time of Service (CTS), as well as recent legal developments that could allow the executive to challenge public spending measures. The union signalled that Thursday’s protest marks the beginning of further mobilisation ahead of the new administration taking office on 28 July.

Lula said Trump was free to support the Bolsonaro family but should refrain from attempting to influence Brazil's democratic process.

"As for me, he can keep sympathising with Bolsonaro, with the father, the son, or the grandson. There is no problem at all. That is his business. But do not interfere in Brazil's elections ," Lula said.

The remarks come amid scrutiny over Eduardo Bolsonaro's contacts with US officials. According to Brazil's Supreme Court, the congressman sought support from the US government to influence legal proceedings involving his father and to encourage sanctions and international pressure against Brazil and members of its judiciary.

"If there is anyone who needs to learn from civilised elections in Brazil, it is my friend Trump," Lula said. "I only hope he does not violate the code of ethics among nations that want their sovereignty to be respected," he added.

Lula said he briefly met Trump during the G7 gathering and stressed that relations between the two countries should be based on mutual respect and respect for national sovereignty.

"The only thing I want is the same respect for Brazil that I have for the United States ," he said. The Brazilian president also revealed that he handed Trump a document outlining alleged links between organised crime in Brazil and the United States, arguing that both countries could cooperate more closely to combat criminal networks.

"I gave him everything in writing because I do not want to limit myself to talking; President Trump talks a lot and listens little," Lula said.

[This article was corrected on June 19th, 2026 to remove incorrect details about the upcoming election.]

“I never back down," Orban told supporters. “I have a good biography, and you can be sure that I will not ruin it at the end.”

According to party officials, 729 of 737 delegates voted in favour of Orban’s re-election, giving him a one-year mandate as party leader.

During his speech, Orban also criticised the migration policies of Hungary’s new government led by the Tisza Party.

“The liberals who have come to power will open the gates, foreigners will come, and they will fleece Hungary,” he warned.

Orban’s Fidesz-KDNP alliance lost power in April after Peter Magyar’s Tisza Party won a parliamentary majority with more than 53% of the vote. Fidesz-KDNP secured just over 38%, ending Orban’s 16-year period in government .

The election campaign was marked by competing allegations of foreign interference. Orban’s government accused the European Union and Ukraine of attempting to influence the vote, claims rejected by Kyiv and opposition figures.

Meanwhile, Fujimori supporters voiced optimism about stability and security , praising her message of reconciliation and tougher action on crime. With quick counts showing a virtual tie and official results fluctuating as votes are processed, both camps remain confident as the final outcome hangs in the balance.

Quick count figures from Datum Internacional and Ipsos show Roberto Sanchez holding a narrow lead of less than one percentage point, while official preliminary results from ONPE indicate Fujimori ahead with a wider margin based on processed tally sheets. Final results are expected in mid-July, with the winner set to take office on 28 July 2026 for a five-year term.

Supporters echoed his message, chanting “For justice and dignity. Fujimori never again”, as quick-count results from Datum Internacional and Ipsos showed a virtual tie between the two candidates, with Sánchez holding a narrow lead.

Petro further alleged electoral fraud and said he does not recognise the preliminary vote count, while de la Espriella, who led the first round with 43.74% of the vote, called on him to accept the result. Ivan Cepeda secured 40.90%, forcing a second round scheduled for 21 June, when voters will decide the country’s next president after no candidate achieved an outright majority.

According to Garcia, 217 trucks are transporting materials for 29,266 voting tables across 2,253 polling centres.

“It was planned for all units to have a global satellite positioning system so we can monitor the location of each one in real time,” he told Viory.

Roberto Burneo, head of the National Elections Jury, said the operation demonstrated the strength and reliability of Peru's electoral system.

“These moments signify the guarantee of democracy , the guarantee that this second-round electoral process will be transparent and completely orderly,” Burneo said.

Peruvians will vote on Sunday in a runoff between Keiko Fujimori of the Popular Force party and left-wing candidate Roberto Sanchez of Together for Peru.

Fujimori secured 17.19 percent of the vote in the first round, while Sanchez received 12.03 percent, leaving both candidates seeking support from voters whose preferred contenders were eliminated.

More than 27 million Peruvians are eligible to cast ballots in the election, which will determine the country's president for the 2026–2031 term.

Cepeda further argued that proposals put forward by de la Espriella represent a risk, claiming they include the introduction of “mega-prisons” inspired by Central American policies and economic measures similar to those promoted by Argentina’s president Javier Milei. His remarks follow a ruling by a municipal criminal court in Bogotá prohibiting the use of the national team jersey in de la Espriella’s campaign. The second round of Colombia’s presidential election is set for 21 June and will determine the successor to President Gustavo Petro for the 2026–2030 term.

“It is a message of hope. It is a message of unity. It is a message not to lose faith in our future,” Fujimori told the crowd.

She also encouraged supporters to use social media and personal networks to promote her platform.

“There are only a few days left, and the race is very close,” she said. “I need you to help spread our proposals.”

Footage from the rally showed supporters waving flags, chanting slogans and recording the event on their mobile phones as Fujimori addressed the gathering.

The rally formed part of a nationwide campaign push by both candidates before Peruvians head to the polls on Sunday.

Fujimori secured 17.19 percent of the vote in the first round, while Sanchez, representing the Together for Peru coalition, received 12.03 percent, leaving both candidates seeking support from voters whose preferred contenders were eliminated.

Fujimori has focused her campaign on economic recovery, job creation and tackling crime, while Sanchez has advocated greater state involvement in the economy and institutional reforms. More than 27 million Peruvians are eligible to vote in the election.

The daughter of former president Alberto Fujimori, Keiko Fujimori is making another bid for the presidency after narrowly losing several previous elections .

Most participants forecast a victory for Fujimori, with one shaman claiming the ritual indicated she would assume the presidency. Others, however, offered differing views, suggesting Sanchez could win the popular vote while raising concerns about possible irregularities.

This concludes our live coverage of Ethiopia's 2026 general election. Stay with Global South World for more updates and information on the results and other interesting developments.

20:20 GMT: Private candidate Abraham Tilahun expresses "irregularities" on the digitally registered voting options.

17:00 GMT: misunderstandings erupt over voting delays

16:30 GMT: 'Ballot stronger than bullet': Ethiopian president votes

Speaking after casting his vote, Taye addressed concerns and criticism surrounding the election, emphasising that the occasion held a significance that extended beyond the political contest itself. “I’m very much excited. I know there are so many detractors out there. There's nothing new about it. It has been the case all over the world,” Taye said.

14:28 GMT: A contending party, the Gogot Party, alleges that its election observers have been beaten and forced to leave the election grounds in central Ethiopia's Welkite.

11:30 GMT: Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed casts his votes

8:50 GMT: Voters continue to queue to cast their ballots at the Beshale Katla polling station in Addis Ababa on June 1, 2026, during Ethiopia’s 2026 parliamentary elections.

8:30 GMT: AU election observer, Uhuru Kenyatta, notes slow election participation from Ethiopians.

8:15 GMT: Temesgen Tiruneh, Aspirant for the Office of Prime Minister, votes. He cast his vote alongside Amhara Regional Administration President Arega Kebede and Amhara Prosperity Party Office Head Yirga Sisay at the Hidase Election Station in Bahir Dar City this morning.

Millions remain unable to vote

Voting has begun across much of Ethiopia, but significant portions of the population have been excluded from the electoral process due to ongoing insecurity.

Most notably, the entire northern region of Tigray, home to an estimated six million people, has been left out of the election . The region is still recovering from a devastating two-year civil war that ended in 2022 and remains embroiled in political disputes with the federal government.

Authorities have also cancelled voting in some constituencies affected by violence in the Amhara and Oromia regions.

Abiy Ahmed seeks another mandate

Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed's Prosperity Party is widely expected to emerge victorious, continuing its hold on power after a landslide win in the previous election.

Although Ethiopians vote for members of parliament rather than directly electing a prime minister, the party that secures a parliamentary majority will form the next government.

Abiy rose to power in 2018 amid widespread anti-government protests and was initially celebrated for political reforms, the release of jailed journalists and opposition figures, and efforts to make peace with neighbouring Eritrea, achievements that earned him the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize.

Key opposition parties and coalitions

Apart from Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and his ruling Prosperity Party, Ethiopia's 2026 election features a fragmented opposition landscape with several parties and coalitions competing for parliamentary seats. Analysts widely expect the opposition to struggle against the ruling party due to organisational weaknesses, security challenges, and political restrictions

Coalition for Ethiopian Unity (CEU)

A newly formed opposition alliance launched in 2025, the coalition brings together several parties, including the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Party (EPRP), Enat Party, All Ethiopian Unity Organisation, One Ethiopia Democratic Party, and Amhara Gionawi Movement Party. The coalition says it is contesting the election on a platform of national unity, democratic reforms, and improved governance.

Oromo Federalist Congress (OFC)

One of Ethiopia's best-known opposition parties, the OFC advocates greater federalism and regional autonomy, particularly for the Oromo people. Veteran opposition figure Merera Gudina has criticized the election environment, arguing that political conditions are not conducive to a genuinely competitive contest.

National Movement of Amhara (NaMA)

NaMA draws much of its support from the Amhara region and focuses on Amhara political interests, federalism, and security concerns. It emerged as one of the more prominent opposition parties following the 2021 election and remains one of the few opposition groups with parliamentary representation.

Ethiopian Citizens for Social Justice (EZEMA)

Led by prominent politician Berhanu Nega, EZEMA presents itself as a national, non-ethnic political movement advocating democratic reforms, economic development, and institutional strengthening. The party has held seats in parliament and remains a recognisable opposition force.

Other registered national parties

Several additional parties are contesting the election, including the Oromo Liberation Front, Oromo Liberation Movement, Ethiopian People Revolutionary Party, Ethiopian Freedom Party, and All Ethiopian Unity Party, among dozens of others registered by the electoral board.

Ethiopia operates a parliamentary system , meaning citizens do not directly elect the prime minister. Instead, voters elect members of parliament, and the party or coalition that wins a majority forms the government.

Key facts

Ethiopians cast ballots for candidates seeking seats in the House of Peoples' Representatives, the country's lower house of parliament.

As more than 50 million Ethiopians are expected to vote in the 2026 election, Global South World will continue to provide updates as voting progresses and results begin to emerge.

This concludes our live coverage of Colombia’s 2026 general election. Stay with Global South World for more updates and information on Colombia’s presidential runoff.

23:30 GMT: Paloma Valencia officially announces her support for presidential candidate Abelardo de la Espriella ahead of Colombia’s runoff election.

22:30 GMT: With nearly 100% of votes counted in Colombia’s presidential election, Abelardo de la Espriella leads with over 43%, followed by Iván Cepeda with close to 41%, sending both candidates to a runoff to decide the country’s next president.

21:00 GMT: Polls close in Colombia’s 2026 presidential election.

20:05 GMT: After accompanying former president Álvaro Uribe during his voting in Rionegro, presidential candidate Paloma Valencia arrives at her polling station in Bogotá, where she casts her vote in Colombia’s presidential election.

18:05 GMT: Esteban González Pons, head of the European Union’s election observation mission, highlights the international monitoring effort in Colombia’s presidential vote, with more than 140 observers from Norway, Switzerland and Canada deployed across all regions to assess the process under democratic standards.

17:10 GMT: Interior Minister Armando Benedetti oversees the national monitoring centre as authorities track the presidential vote in real time, coordinating with regional governments and overseeing security, mobility and emergency response. More than 122,000 polling stations have been set up to serve over 41 million registered voters nationwide.

16:55 GMT: Presidential candidate Claudia López votes in Bogotá, urging Colombians to turn out in large numbers. Accompanied by her dog “Dulce”, she says she voted “with hope and optimism” for a country with more opportunities for young people and women, adding that the ballot remains the strongest tool to protect democracy and shape the future.

16:45 GMT: Senator Iván Cepeda, from the ruling Pacto Histórico party, casts his vote at Colegio San Lucas in Bogotá’s Kennedy district, where he is joined by dozens of supporters.

16:35 GMT: Journalist and former presidential pre-candidate Vicky Dávila casts her vote in Colombia’s presidential election.

15:00 GMT: Colombia’s Interior Ministry reports 443 complaints of electoral offences registered so far during Sunday’s vote.

14:30 GMT: Vice President Francia Márquez calls on Colombians to head to the polls and exercise their right to vote.

14:25 GMT: Presidential candidate Paloma Valencia calls on Colombian women to make history by electing the country’s first female president, saying “it is our time,” as she appears alongside former president Álvaro Uribe.

14:20 GMT: Presidential candidate Iván Cepeda, in a message to the nation, urged voters to back a future focused on reducing poverty and inequality, protecting natural resources and building a modern, diversified economy. He also emphasised hope over fear and unity over division, calling on Colombians to turn out and vote.

14:10 GMT: Presidential candidate Abelardo de la Espriella votes in Barranquilla, saying “we will defeat tyranny”.

13:45 GMT: Gustavo Petro casts his vote in Colombia’s presidential election, which will determine his successor for the 2026–2030 term.

13:30 GMT: President Gustavo Petro casts his vote in Bogotá’s Plaza de Bolívar, highlighting the ballot as a popular mandate to choose the leader who will guide Colombia for the next four years. He also reaffirmed electoral guarantees and dismissed past claims about seeking to remain in power or establish a dictatorship.

13:20 GMT: Córdoba Governor Erasmo Zuleta officially opens the electoral day, urging citizens to participate massively, freely and democratically in the presidential vote.

13:00 GMT: Voting gets underway in Colombia, with early lines reported at some of the country’s largest polling stations.

12:30 GMT: Colombia prepares to head to the polls as Bogotá readies key voting sites.

Polls are expected to open in Colombia’s presidential election at 8:00 am local time (13:00 GMT) and close at 4:00 pm local time (21:00 GMT).

What to know

Colombia is heading to the polls this Sunday, May 31, for its presidential election, where voters will choose a new president and vice president. More than 41 million citizens are eligible to vote. If no candidate secures over 50% of the valid vote, a runoff between the top two contenders will take place in the following weeks. Voting is not compulsory, but turnout remains a key factor in determining the outcome.

The election unfolds in a highly polarised political climate, with voters choosing between sharply different visions for the country. Issues such as security , education, economic stability and national sovereignty are at the centre of public debate, reflecting broader concerns about the country’s direction.

Colombian authorities have introduced several restrictions and security measures ahead of the election weekend, including a “ley seca” that bans alcohol sales in many areas, temporary border closures for Colombian nationals on election day, and increased deployments of police and military forces nationwide.

More than 13,000 voting sites have been established across the country, with approximately 800,000 citizens assigned as election jurors and vote counters.

Current polling indicates that three candidates are leading the race: Iván Cepeda from the left, Abelardo de la Espriella representing an anti-establishment right platform, and centre-right candidate Paloma Valencia. Analysts expect Cepeda to qualify for the second round, while competition for the second runoff position remains close between De la Espriella and Valencia.

The campaign period has included allegations of electoral fraud from President Gustavo Petro, alongside criticism of the election management system. However, Colombia’s electoral authorities, including the National Electoral Council (CNE), the Registraduría, and election observer groups, have rejected claims that the voting process lacks transparency.

Authorities have identified more than 200 municipalities as facing elevated risks of electoral violence or fraud, with concerns particularly focused on rural areas. Security concerns remain heightened following the assassination attempt on presidential pre-candidate Miguel Uribe last year.

Voters will also have the option to cast a “voto en blanco”, which is recognised as a formal protest vote rather than a spoiled ballot.

Key candidates & support

Iván Cepeda (Historic Pact)

A prominent left-wing figure, Cepeda has built his campaign around social justice, human rights and structural reform. His candidacy draws on the broader political movement associated with progressive forces in Colombia, appealing particularly to younger voters, urban sectors and those who support a stronger role for the state in addressing inequality. His supporters often frame his campaign within a long history of social struggles, positioning him as part of a project aimed at deepening democratic inclusion. Cepeda is considered one of the leading contenders, with a solid base but facing challenges in expanding his appeal among more conservative and undecided voters.

Abelardo de la Espriella (Defenders of the Homeland)

A right-leaning candidate and well-known lawyer, de la Espriella has centred his campaign on security, institutional order and a tougher stance on crime. He appeals to voters concerned about rising insecurity and those who favour stronger enforcement policies and a more conservative political direction. His message also resonates with sectors calling for balance in governance and sceptical of left-wing reforms. He has gained visibility and support among conservative voters, positioning himself as a competitive candidate in a fragmented field.

Paloma Valencia (Conservative Party)

She gained momentum after securing around 3.2 million votes in a March primary. Positioned as a more “moderate” conservative, she appeals to centre-right voters with a focus on security, institutional order and economic stability. A vocal critic of President Gustavo Petro and supporter of the “No” vote in the 2016 peace deal, she has a solid conservative base, though her polarising profile may limit broader appeal.

Debates and campaign dynamics

The absence of major televised debates in Colombia’s presidential race reflects both strategic decisions by candidates and the highly polarised political environment. Leading contenders have largely prioritised direct campaigning and controlled media appearances over open confrontation, seeking to avoid risks in a fragmented race with no clear frontrunner. At the same time, deep ideological divisions and mutual distrust between political camps have made consensus around debate formats more difficult, limiting opportunities for head-to-head exchanges ahead of the vote.

Political climate and stakes

This election is seen as a crucial moment for Colombia’s democracy, as it navigates deep divisions and competing narratives about its future. Campaign rhetoric has reflected these tensions, with candidates mobilising support around themes of change, stability and national identity.

Security remains a central concern for many voters, alongside economic challenges and questions about governance. The outcome will likely shape Colombia’s domestic and foreign policy direction, particularly in relation to international partnerships and internal reforms.

With no clear consensus among voters and a divided electorate, analysts expect a competitive race that could extend to a second round. The next administration will face the challenge of governing in a fragmented political environment while addressing key issues such as security, inequality and institutional trust.

Ultimately, the election will serve as a test of Colombia’s democratic resilience and its ability to navigate political polarisation while maintaining stability.

EZEMA deputy leader Negatu Wolde urged voters to move away from ethnic-based politics .

“We call on the people of our country to use this opportunity as a golden opportunity to break free from the cycle of ethnic politics that has oppressed, isolated and divided our country for many years,” he told Viory.

The election campaign has been overshadowed by concerns over media freedom, political inclusiveness and security challenges. EZEMA member Eyouel Solomon accused the government of dominating the media landscape and limiting fair political competition.

“We have seen two things: commercial media that sometimes give some space for opposition parties, and government media that acts as the mouth of the government,” he said. “This is not fair.”

The process has also been disrupted by ongoing conflicts in the Amhara and Oromia regions. Ethiopia’s National Election Board suspended polling in 46 districts affected by insecurity.

Despite the tensions, supporters at the rally expressed confidence that EZEMA could make gains in the June 1 vote.

“If it wins, it is a worthy party that has shown its ability to lead the country,” supporter Dagem Assefa said. “But if it loses, it will prepare peacefully for the next election.”

Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, who has led Ethiopia for eight years, heads the ruling Prosperity Party, which was formed in 2019 from the former Ethiopian People’s Revolutionary Democratic Front coalition.

"I am happy to announce to you that tonight, together with my friend Yair Lapid, I am doing the most Zionist and most patriotic act we have ever done for our country," Bennett said.

Bennett stated that if he returns to office, he will establish a state commission to investigate the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attack, a step he said the current government has not taken.

“On the first day of a new government led by me, we will establish a state commission of inquiry into the October massacre to bring truth to the families and answers to all the people of Israel." He also said his administration would introduce a limit of eight years for a prime minister’s tenure.

Lapid, who currently leads the opposition, said Bennett would head the new party and described him as capable of leading the country.

He added that a unified opposition could defeat the current government, referencing Peter Magyar's landslide win against Viktor Orban in the recent elections in Hungary.

"After 16 years in power, Orban lost. It happened because people believed change was possible. They united behind a single candidate, fought for their country, and won. That's why Bennett and I are here."

Netanyahu, Israel’s longest-serving prime minister, has faced criticism over his handling of regional conflicts and allegations that he has avoided accountability for failures during his time in office.

Bennett and Lapid previously formed a coalition that removed Netanyahu from power in 2021, ending his 12-year rule. The coalition lasted 18 months before Netanyahu returned to office in November 2022.

Galarreta said the Armed Forces had previously managed the task without major incident and suggested they could also be allowed to vote earlier, with their ballots kept secure until counting begins. He framed the proposal as a practical response to the setbacks seen in the first round.

His comments follow complaints over the conduct of the election, which was extended into a second day in some places because of ballot delays and other logistical disruptions. International observers from the European Union found problems in the process but said there was no credible evidence of fraud, despite allegations from some candidates.

With most votes counted, Fujimori was leading the race with just under 17% of the vote, ahead of Roberto Sánchez, setting up a runoff on June 7 after no candidate came close to an outright majority.

Galarreta also rejected claims that Peru’s democratic order had broken down, pointing instead to the findings of international observer missions, which highlighted administrative failures but did not back accusations that the vote had been manipulated.

“The votes obtained by the candidate pairs are proclaimed as follows: first - Romuald Wadagni and Mariam Chabi Talata; 4,252,347 votes, representing 94.05 per cent,” Lafia said.

The opposition ticket of Paul Hounkpe and Rock Judicael Hounwanou placed second with 5.95% of the vote.

CENA said voter turnout stood at 58.75%, a marked increase from the 2021 presidential election , which was widely boycotted by opposition parties.

The result further cements the grip of the ruling Progressive Union for Renewal and the Republican Bloc, which won all 109 seats in parliament in January.

Wadagni is set to become the first president to serve a seven-year term under constitutional reforms adopted in 2024 and 2025. The changes also synchronised presidential, legislative and municipal elections .

The vote took place against a backdrop of political tension, with several prominent opposition figures barred from contesting because of strict endorsement rules, raising concerns about political pluralism in the West African country.

The election also followed a failed coup attempt in December 2025.

With 98.89% of the vote counted, TISZA won 138 seats, Fidesz-KDNP secured 55 seats, and Mi Hazánk obtained 6 seats.

The outcome marks a major political shift in Hungary, where Orbán had been one of Europe’s most controversial leaders. He was widely seen as the European Union’s most autocratic leader and maintained close ties with U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. His removal is expected to ease tensions within the EU, where officials have long accused him of undermining democratic systems and taking advantage of institutional weaknesses.

Orbán also faced criticism over his stance on Ukraine. He was accused of supporting actions that helped block €90 billion in European support to Ukraine, raising concerns among European leaders about Hungary’s role in the bloc.

Despite endorsements from Trump and campaign support that included visits from U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance, the vote appeared to be driven mainly by domestic issues.

Voters were reported to be concerned about Hungary’s economic challenges, as well as allegations of corruption and cronyism linked to Orbán’s administration. The scale of the defeat indicated widespread dissatisfaction, as TISZA was projected to dominate both the national party-list vote and many individual constituencies.

In his speech to supporters, Magyar promised to return Hungary to the main fold of European politics , pledging a pro-European Union and pro-NATO direction for the country.

“My fellow citizens, Hungary will once again be a strong ally in the European Union and NATO. Hungary will once again be a strong ally representing Hungarian interests, because our country's place for a thousand years in Europe was, is, and will be. We will rebuild and strengthen, we will place it on new foundations and expand the cooperation of the Visegrad Four wherever possible,” he said.

The result sparked celebrations in Budapest, where tens of thousands of people took to the streets.

With a projected majority above the threshold required to govern alone, Magyar is expected to form the next government , ending Orbán’s long hold on power and signalling a shift in Hungary’s position within Europe.

This concludes our live coverage of Peru’s 2026 general election. Stay with Global South World for the latest developments and final outcomes as the electoral process continues to unfold.

02:33 GMT: Peru extends voting into Monday after more than 63,000 people were unable to cast their ballots.

Electoral authorities announced that voting will continue until 13 April in order to allow those affected by earlier disruptions to participate. The decision follows reports of delays and logistical issues at polling stations that prevented tens of thousands of voters from casting their ballots during Sunday’s election.

23:10 GMT: Polls close in Peru’s first-round presidential election, with exit polls pointing to Keiko Fujimori in the lead.

According to a Datum exit poll, right-wing candidate Keiko Fujimori is the most voted, while Rafael López Aliaga appears to be narrowly edging into second place, with only a slim margin over Jorge Nieto, suggesting a tightly contested race for the run-off.

23:05 GMT: P olls close in Peru as attention turns to which candidates will advance to a likely run-off

Voting has officially ended across the country following an extended election day marked by delays and logistical challenges. With a highly fragmented field of 35 candidates and no clear frontrunner, expectations are growing that the presidential race will head to a second round, with results set to determine which two candidates move forward to the decisive run-off.

22:44 GMT: Fuerza Popular presidential candidate Keiko Fujimori calls on electoral authorities to extend voting hours or organise a complementary vote for affected polling stations.

Fujimori urged the National Jury of Elections (JNE) and the Office of Electoral Processes (ONPE) to take additional measures to ensure participation at 211 polling stations reportedly impacted by earlier disruptions. Her remarks come amid broader concerns over delays and logistical issues during election day.

20:50 GMT: Presidential candidate Francisco Diez Canseco of Perú Acción casts his vote at Alfonso Ugarte school in Lima’s San Isidro district during the 2026 election

20:45 GMT: Allegations of potential electoral irregularities emerge in Peru, with claims that around 13% of polling stations in Lima, representing over one million votes, may have been affected.

While these assertions have not been officially confirmed, they have prompted calls in some quarters to review the voting process, with suggestions that parts of the election could be repeated if significant irregularities are verified.

18:50 GMT: Presidential candidate José Luna Gálvez of Podemos Perú casts his vote at the Parque de la Amistad Convention Centre in Lima’s Santiago de Surco district

18:40 GMT: Peru’s interim president dismisses fraud claims following delays in opening polling stations

18:25 GMT: Magnitude 4 earthquake felt in Lima and Callao during Peru’s election day, with no injuries or damage reported.

Authorities said the tremor, centred offshore in the Pacific, was mild and posed no tsunami risk.

18:20 GMT: Presidential candidate Mario Vizcarra of Perú Primero casts his vote at Federico Villareal school in Lima’s Miraflores district

17:55 GMT: Peru’s electoral authorities extend voting by one hour nationwide following delays at polling stations, particularly in Lima, officials say.

The head of the ONPE, Piero Corvetto, said the election authority approved the measure, extending voting until 6:00 PM local time (11:00 PM GMT).

17:50 GMT: Presidential candidate George Forsyth of Somos Perú casts his vote at Isabel La Católica school in Lima’s La Victoria district

17:42 GMT: Presidential candidate Herbert Caller of the Partido Patriótico del Perú casts his vote at the National Agrarian University in Lima’s La Molina district

17:32 GMT: Reports emerge of voting disruptions in Lima, with some voters unable to cast ballots, raising concerns over the electoral process

17:10 GMT: Presidential candidate Antonio Ortiz of Salvemos al Perú casts his vote at Santa María Purísima school in Lima’s San Martín de Porres district

16:27 GMT: Presidential candidate Carlos Jaico casts his vote at Alfonso Ugarte school in Lima’s San Isidro district

15:40 GMT: Several major polling stations in Peru report delays in opening and receiving voters, in some cases due to a lack of electoral materials

15:20 GMT: Presidential candidate Rafael López Aliaga casts his vote during Peru’s general election

15:05 GMT: Presidential candidate Jorge Nieto violates electoral law by casting his vote outside the secret ballot booth

15:00 GMT: Presidential candidate Álvaro Paz de la Barra casts his vote in Lima’s La Molina district during Peru’s 2026 general election

14:00 GMT: Fuerza Popular presidential candidate Keiko Fujimori waves as she arrives to cast her vote in Lima

13:00 GMT: Keiko Fujimori, joined by family members, visits the grave of her father, former president Alberto Fujimori, at a Lima cemetery

12:52 GMT: Keiko Fujimori heads to a cemetery ahead of her election day breakfast, saying it is her way of honouring her parents’ memory

12:49 GMT: Presidential candidate Rafael López Aliaga heads to Pamplona Alta for traditional election day breakfast

12:30 GMT: Peru activates large-scale security operation for Sunday’s general election

12:00 GMT: Polls open across Peru as voting begins in highly fragmented election featuring a record 35 candidates

The voting process is set to run for 10 hours on election day, with polls expected to open at 7:00 AM local time (12:00 PM GMT) and close at 5:00 PM local time (10:00 PM GMT).

What to know

On April 12, Peru will hold its general election, in which voters will choose a new president, two vice-presidents and all members of Congress. If no presidential candidate secures more than 50% of the vote in the first round, a run-off will be held between the top two candidates several weeks later. Voting is compulsory for citizens aged 18 to 70, although enforcement of penalties for abstention is often inconsistent.

The election takes place against a backdrop of prolonged political instability. Over the past decade, Peru has had eight presidents, reflecting a persistent cycle of institutional crisis, impeachment proceedings and governance challenges. This instability has eroded public trust in political institutions and contributed to widespread voter disillusionment.

Security concerns, economic uncertainty and frustration with political elites are central issues shaping voter sentiment. While Peru has traditionally maintained macroeconomic stability, inequality, informal employment and rising crime rates remain pressing concerns for many voters.

The political landscape is highly fragmented and crowded. A record number of 35 candidates are contesting the 2026 election, making the outcome difficult to predict and increasing the likelihood of a run-off. Polling suggests a large share of undecided voters, further adding to uncertainty.

Front-running candidates & proposals

Keiko Fujimori (Fuerza Popular): A prominent right-wing candidate and experienced political figure, Fujimori has consistently ranked among the frontrunners. She campaigns on strengthening security, encouraging investment and restoring political stability, while maintaining a strong and loyal support base despite past electoral defeats and legal controversies.

Rafael López Aliaga (Renovación Popular): Another leading right-wing figure, López Aliaga appeals to conservative voters with proposals focused on economic liberalisation, infrastructure development and a tougher stance on crime.

Other candidates: The race includes a wide range of contenders from across the political spectrum, but none has consolidated sufficient support to clearly dominate the field. This fragmentation reflects broader dissatisfaction with traditional political parties.

Political climate & stakes

Peru’s election comes at a critical moment for its democracy. The country’s recent history of rapid presidential turnover underscores deep institutional weaknesses and ongoing tensions between the executive and legislative branches. Governance challenges have often led to confrontations, impeachments and abrupt leadership changes.

The campaign has also highlighted polarisation within Peruvian society. Candidates have sought to mobilise voters through strong rhetoric, with some framing the election as a turning point for stability and order. High-profile rallies, including those led by Fujimori, have emphasised resilience and defiance amid a competitive and uncertain race.

With no clear frontrunner and a fragmented political field, analysts expect the next president to face significant challenges in building consensus in Congress. This could limit the government ’s ability to pass reforms and address key issues such as security, economic recovery and institutional reform.

Ultimately, the election is seen as a test of Peru’s ability to break its cycle of political instability and restore confidence in its democratic system.

This is the end of our live coverage of the 2026 Benin presidential election. Result is expected to be announced by authorities early in the week. Follow all Global South World Channels for more updates.

19:00 GMT: Incumbent Finance Minister Romuald Wadagni has emerged as the favourite to win the 2026 elections, positioning him to be the heir to Patrice Talon, who has led the West African country for the past decade.

18:00 GMT:  Benin’s civil society electoral platform says its observers recorded several irregularities during Sunday’s April 12, 2026 presidential election, according to findings presented in Cotonou by Étienne Adossou, a retired army general and member of the platform’s electoral situation room. The platform said it deployed 1,771 observers nationwide, including 1,200 stationed at polling centres and 571 on mobile assignments. Its initial assessment, completed at 10:00 a.m., was based on observations from 1,200 polling stations. Among the incidents reported were cases of ballot boxes allegedly containing ballots before the official start of voting, particularly in parts of the Atlantic and Zou regions.

At one polling station in Sèmè-Kpodji, observers said more than 120 ballots were found in the box before 6:45 a.m., despite no matching record of voters on the electoral register. Similar reports were also recorded elsewhere. The platform also cited alleged cases of multiple voting in some localities in the Couffo and Mono regions.

In all, it said 109 alerts were logged and sent to the electoral situation room’s response unit, most of them linked to early openings of polling stations and other voting-day anomalies. Despite the reported incidents, the platform said several aspects of the process generally complied with electoral rules. It noted, for instance, that all three polling officials were present in 98.38 percent of the polling stations observed.

16:00 GMT:  Polling stations across the country closed at 4:00 p.m.

At the CEG Le Littoral polling centre in Cotonou’s 1st district, ballot counting began in most polling stations soon after the close of polls.

At Polling Station 6, officials of the CENA began counting ballots at 4:28 p.m., in the presence of representatives of the two tickets contesting Sunday’s presidential election.

Overall, the vote in Cotonou was conducted in a calm and peaceful atmosphere.

12:00 GMT : Opposition candidate Paul Hounkpe casts his ballot.

11:30 GMT:  Foreign Minister Olushegun Adjadi Bakari arrived at 11:35 a.m. to cast his ballot at polling station 1. Speaking to reporters after voting, Bakari said , “I have just fulfilled my civic duty. I think it is a huge opportunity for us to make the right choice for our country. It is this choice that will determine the direction of our country over the next seven years. So it is with a very strong sense of duty that I came here today to express my civic duty.”

11:00 GMT:  Aurélie Adam Soule Zoumarou, Benin’s Minister of Digital Economy, said she had fulfilled her civic duty by voting at the Kobi primary school in the Gourou district of Nikki. “I have carried out my civic duty today by voting,” she said , urging all eligible citizens to turn out and exercise their fundamental right to vote.

10:30 GMT: Former minister Christine Adjokè Ouinsavi cast her ballot on Sunday at the Hangar public square polling centre in Adakplamè, in the commune of Kétou. Speaking after voting, she said she was pleased to have fulfilled her civic duty in a calm atmosphere. “I feel very satisfied to have carried out this act, which honours me as a citizen, and to have done so in a peaceful environment,” she said.

10:30 GMT: Vice President Mariam Chabi Talata cast her ballot on Sunday morning at the Nabissou public primary school in the Guèma district of Parakou. She urged Beninese voters to recognise the power of the ballot, saying, “Each Beninese must understand that their vote can help solve their everyday problems.” Stressing the importance of civic participation, she added that “the vote is the channel through which the citizen speaks to leaders and expresses expectations.”

10:00 GMT: President Patrice Talon and First Lady Claudine Talon have arrived at polling centre 10078, Charles Guillot School in Zongo Nima, Cotonou, to cast their ballots in Benin’s presidential election.

9:30 GMT: Benin’s Economy and Finance Minister, Romuald Wadagni, one of the presidential candidates, has cast his vote at the Agonvè polling centre in Lokossa.

9:30 GMT: Turnout was strong from the early hours in Wassa, where voting began with a particularly large crowd, including many members of the Celestial Christian community. Polling station officer Houdé Mardite said told La Nouvelle Tribune that more than 200 of the 332 registered voters had already cast their ballots. By 9:40 a.m., turnout had eased slightly, though voters were still arriving steadily.

8:30 GMT: Slight delays at the Ganmè 1 and Ganmè 2 polling stations did little to unsettle voters, with polling beginning at 7:22 a.m. after minor logistical adjustments. Despite the late start, the atmosphere remained calm and orderly.

08:00 GMT:  Voting began relatively calmly at the Zanzoun Primary School polling station, although station 1 opened slightly late at 7:10 a.m. because of delays linked to the installation of staff from the National Autonomous Electoral Commission (CENA).

07:30 GMT: Early voters in Parakou described the voting process as calm and straightforward. Alassane Idrissou, the first registered voter at his polling station, said he arrived as soon as it opened so he could cast his ballot before returning to his farm. “I am proud to be the first to vote this morning. Everything is going well, peacefully. I encourage all citizens to turn out in large numbers to vote, in peace,” he said.

07:00 GMT:  Voting in Benin’s 2026 presidential election got under way on Sunday, April 12, with polling stations opening across the country. In Abomey-Calavi, one of the country’s biggest electoral districts, the process started smoothly, with most polling centres opening on schedule at 7 a.m. At the Kpanrou polling station, located at EPP Centre, voting materials and staff were in place early, allowing all stations to open at the same time. A similar situation was reported in Zinvié, another major district in Abomey-Calavi .

Key issues 

One of the central issues is whether the next leader can sustain the country’s economic growth. Benin’s economy  expanded  by around 7% in 2025, driven by investments in agriculture, trade and infrastructure. However, many citizens say the benefits have not been evenly shared, with poverty persisting in rural and northern regions.

Security  is another major concern, particularly in the north, where attacks by armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State have intensified. The region has seen deadly assaults on military posts, and tensions remain high following a failed coup attempt in December.

The election is also being watched for its implications on democracy. President Patrice Talon’s government has faced criticism from opposition groups and rights organisations over  restrictions  on protests, arrests of critics and the exclusion of opposition parties from parliament. Read more .

Who are the candidates?

Wadagni, 49, a former Deloitte executive, has campaigned on continuity, highlighting economic gains under Talon’s leadership. “I had the honour of managing one of your most precious assets: your money,” he told supporters during the campaign, pledging to govern with the same “seriousness and dedication.” He has promised to expand healthcare and build on  infrastructure  and economic reforms.

His opponent, Paul Hounkpe, 56, represents the Cowry Forces for an Emerging Benin (FCBE). A former teacher and culture minister, he has positioned himself as a moderate alternative, promising to lower the cost of  living  and secure the release of political detainees.

The main opposition party, the Democrats, is absent from the race after failing to secure the required backing to field a candidate, leaving Hounkpe as the only challenger. Read more .

Elections background

Benin’s president is elected through a two-round voting system and now serves a seven-year term following a 2025 constitutional amendment.

If no candidate wins more than half of the votes in the first round, the top two candidates face each other in a run-off held within 15 days. Presidents may serve a maximum of two terms, even if those terms are not consecutive.

Under changes introduced in 2019, every presidential candidate must run with a vice-presidential partner. The vice president serves the same seven-year term and is expected to complete the president’s tenure if the office becomes vacant.

To qualify, candidates must be Beninese citizens, either by birth or by having lived in the country for at least 10 years, and must be between 40 and 70 years old. They must also be of “good character and great probity”, enjoy full civil and political rights, pass physical and mental assessments, and secure nominations from at least 10% of all MPs and mayors.

Security is another major concern, particularly in the north, where attacks by armed groups linked to al-Qaeda and the Islamic State have intensified. The region has seen deadly assaults on military posts, and tensions remain high following a failed coup attempt in December.

The election is also being watched for its implications on democracy. President Patrice Talon’s government has faced criticism from opposition groups and rights organisations over restrictions on protests, arrests of critics and the exclusion of opposition parties from parliament.

With the ruling coalition controlling all seats in the National Assembly and the main opposition absent from the ballot, there is fear of a shrinking political space . The ruling government, however, argues that stability is needed to sustain economic gains and address security threats.

Wadagni, 49, a former Deloitte executive, has campaigned on continuity, highlighting economic gains under Talon’s leadership. “I had the honour of managing one of your most precious assets: your money,” he told supporters during the campaign, pledging to govern with the same “seriousness and dedication.” He has promised to expand healthcare and build on infrastructure and economic reforms.

His opponent, Paul Hounkpe, 56, represents the Cowry Forces for an Emerging Benin (FCBE). A former teacher and culture minister, he has positioned himself as a moderate alternative, promising to lower the cost of living and secure the release of political detainees.

The main opposition party, the Democrats, is absent from the race after failing to secure the required backing to field a candidate, leaving Hounkpe as the only challenger.

About eight million registered voters are eligible to cast ballots. A candidate must secure more than 50% of the vote to win outright, or a run-off will be held on May 10.

Orbán accused the opposition Tisza party of threatening stability and suggested a change of government could pull Hungary closer to Brussels and deeper into external conflicts. The election has increasingly been framed by Orbán as a choice between “peace and war,” with his campaign focusing heavily on immigration, the war in Ukraine and Hungary’s fraught relationship with the European Union .

The vote on April 12 is shaping up to be Orbán’s toughest contest in years. Opposition leader Péter Magyar and his Tisza party have gained momentum by casting the election as a referendum on Hungary’s place in Europe and on Orbán’s 16 years in power, during which critics say democratic standards have eroded and ties with Brussels have deteriorated.

Recent polling has painted a mixed picture, though several independent surveys have shown Tisza ahead among likely voters, while Orbán has retained strong backing in rural areas and among older Hungarians.

This brings our live coverage of Djibouti’s 2026 general election to an end. The vote is widely expected to extend President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh's rule for over two decades. Follow Global South World for ongoing updates as the process continues, with final results expected from the Electoral Commission within the next 48 hours.

15:30 GMT: IGAD perspective on Djibouti elections

12:30 GMT: Online reactions trail the elections

12:00 GMT: President Guelleh casts his vote

The leader said, "Everything went well thanks to God, I have fulfilled my duty as a citizen, and I hope that the citizens of Djibouti will do the same," after casting his ballot.

7:50 GMT: Voting continues in Djibouti

7:02 GMT: Guelleh promises prosperity

During the final campaign run, sitting President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh assured Djiboutians that his party would continue to promote prosperity.

6:16 GMT: Voting begins in Djibouti

Djibouti heads to the polls on Friday, April 10, 2026, but few observers expect surprises.

At the centre is President Ismaïl Omar Guelleh, widely known as “IOG”, who has ruled Djibouti since 1999 after succeeding his uncle, Hassan Gouled Aptidon, the country’s first president. If re-elected, Guelleh would extend his tenure to nearly three decades in power.

His dominance is backed by the  ruling party, the People’s Rally for Progress  (RPP), which leads the broader governing coalition, the Union for the Presidential Majority (UMP).

A 2010 constitutional amendment removed presidential term limits, allowing Guelleh to run indefinitely. More recently, in 2025, Djibouti’s parliament eliminated the 75-year age cap for presidential candidates, a move widely interpreted as designed to ensure Guelleh, now 78, could stand again.

Who is contesting IOG?

Mohamed Farah Samatar stands as the sole challenger to President Guelleh, though his candidacy carries its own complexities. A former insider of the ruling establishment, he is now contesting the presidency under the banner of the Unified Democratic Centre (CDU).

During the lead-up to the votes, Samatar took his campaign to the Tadjourah and Obock regions, where he addressed supporters and attempted to project an alternative vision for the country, insisting that “another Djibouti is possible”.

Even so, analysts remain sceptical about the broader significance of the race. Sonia Le Gouriellec, a specialist on the Horn of Africa at Lille Catholic University, told AFP: “There’s not much at stake. It’s just a token competition.”

Who can vote?

Roughly  243,000 voters are registered for Djibouti’s 2026 presidential election , according to data from the International Foundation for Electoral Systems, out of a national population estimated at just over one million.

Polling stations are expected to open in the morning and close later in the day, after which counting is expected to begin.

Despite being labelled an “electoral autocracy” by international monitors, Djibouti is hosting a regional observer mission from the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), with 17 observers from Ethiopia, Kenya , Somalia, South Sudan and Uganda deployed nationwide.

The bloc is expected to release its initial assessment after the vote, followed by a formal statement on 12 April.

His dominance is backed by the ruling party, the People’s Rally for Progress (RPP), which leads the broader governing coalition, the Union for the Presidential Majority (UMP).

A 2010 constitutional amendment removed presidential term limits, allowing Guelleh to run indefinitely. More recently, in 2025, Djibouti’s parliament eliminated the 75-year age cap for presidential candidates, a move widely interpreted as designed to ensure Guelleh, now 78, could stand again.

The electoral field itself underscores the imbalance. In previous elections, Guelleh has secured overwhelming victories, including 87% of the vote in 2016 and over 97% in 2021, figures that international observers and opposition groups have questioned.

Who is contesting IOG?

Mohamed Farah Samatar stands as the sole challenger to President Guelleh, though his candidacy carries its own complexities. A former insider of the ruling establishment, he is now contesting the presidency under the banner of the Unified Democratic Centre (CDU).

During the lead-up to the votes, Samatar took his campaign to the Tadjourah and Obock regions, where he addressed supporters and attempted to project an alternative vision for the country, insisting that “another Djibouti is possible”.

Even so, analysts remain sceptical about the broader significance of the race. Sonia Le Gouriellec, a specialist on the Horn of Africa at Lille Catholic University, told AFP: “There’s not much at stake. It’s just a token competition.”

Criticism has been sharper from civil society. Omar Ali Ewado, who leads the Djibouti League of Human Rights (LDDH), dismissed the process outright, describing the vote as a “masquerade” and a “foregone conclusion”.

This context shapes the core issue about how the election is unlikely to produce political change, but it may intensify uncertainty about what comes next.

Who can vote?

Roughly 243,000 voters are registered for Djibouti’s 2026 presidential election , according to data from the International Foundation for Electoral Systems, out of a national population estimated at just over one million.

That marks a modest increase from the around 215,000 registered voters in 2021, pointing to a gradual expansion in the electoral roll, though still representing only about a quarter of the population.

Historically, turnout has been relatively strong on paper, averaging close to 67%, though critics argue these figures should be viewed in the context of limited political competition.

Polling stations are expected to open in the morning and close later in the day, after which counting is expected to begin.

Despite being labelled an “electoral autocracy” by international monitors, Djibouti is hosting a regional observer mission from the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), with 17 observers from Ethiopia, Kenya, Somalia, South Sudan and Uganda deployed nationwide.

The bloc is expected to release its initial assessment after the vote, followed by a formal statement on 12 April.

What is at stake?

Djibouti’s location along the Bab el-Mandeb Strait places it at the crossroads of global commerce. Estimates suggest that around 12–15% of global trade and a significant share of oil shipments pass through this narrow waterway connecting the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden. The country has leveraged this position to build an economy centred on logistics, ports, and foreign military partnerships.

The Port of Doraleh, one of the most important infrastructure assets in the region, serves as a critical hub for shipping and for landlocked Ethiopia, which relies on Djibouti for roughly 90–95% of its imports and exports. Revenues from port operations, logistics services, and foreign base leases form a substantial part of Djibouti’s national income.

This strategic value has attracted a concentration of global military presence rarely seen in such a small state.

Djibouti hosts:

Additionally, although Djibouti has invested heavily in infrastructure, including rail links and port expansion projects often financed through external borrowing, concerns persist about public debt levels, which have at times exceeded 70% of GDP, much of it linked to Chinese-funded projects.

Youth unemployment remains high, and the benefits of growth have not been evenly distributed, contributing to underlying social discontent.

That challenger is Péter Magyar, a former Fidesz insider who now leads the Tisza (Respect and Freedom) Party. What looks like a domestic political contest is also being watched closely far beyond Hungary, with implications for the EU, the US, Russia, and Ukraine.

Orbán’s campaign has focused heavily on the idea of “war or peace.” He has positioned himself as Hungary’s protector, warning that “progressive forces” in the West and Ukraine are trying to pull the country into conflict.

Across Budapest, that message is hard to miss. Posters show Volodymyr Zelensky and Ursula von der Leyen as threatening figures, often described as part of a “pro-war lobby.” Orbán has also claimed—without evidence—that Ukraine could attack Hungary. His allies have gone further, branding Magyar as an “agent of Brussels.”

Magyar, 45, is not a typical opposition figure . He comes from Orbán’s inner circle and broke away after a corruption and pardon scandal. Since then, his Tisza Party has gained momentum.

His focus is different. He talks about the economy, corruption, and the rule of law, what he calls everyday issues. He has also promised to unlock between €18 billion and €22.5 billion in frozen EU funds by restoring Hungary’s alignment with European standards.

Unlike past challengers, Magyar connects with voters in rural areas through retail politics, and his right-leaning background makes him harder to dismiss.

The outcome matters on several levels. At home, Hungary is ranked as the most corrupt country in the EU, with most of its media and judiciary under state control. A Magyar win would aim to reverse that and dismantle what critics call a “soft autocracy.”

In Europe, Orbán has built a reputation as the EU’s “disruptor-in-chief,” often blocking aid to Ukraine and sanctions on Russia. Some EU leaders are now even considering suspending Hungary’s voting rights.

There are also wider geopolitical stakes. Hungary has been accused of acting as Moscow’s “mole” inside the EU, with leaked calls suggesting coordination with Russian diplomats. If Orbán loses, Russia could lose a key ally, and Ukraine could find stronger support.

In the US, Orbán has backing from Donald Trump and has hosted Vice President JD Vance, but some US Senators are pushing sanctions over Hungary’s ties to Russian energy.

Even with polls putting Tisza ahead by 10 to 12 points, victory is not certain. Orbán has reshaped the system, rewriting the constitution and gerrymandering districts to favour Fidesz.

Experts say Magyar may need at least a six-point lead just to win a majority. The campaign has also been hit by claims of Russian-backed disinformation, known as “Gamechanger,” aimed at damaging the opposition and even suggesting staged assassination plots.

The transition from Humala to Kuczynski in 2016 initially followed a standard electoral process, yet it also marked the beginning of a more fragmented political era. Kuczynski governed with a hostile Congress, which repeatedly sought his removal. Mounting pressure linked to corruption allegations ultimately led to his resignation in March 2018, setting a precedent for executive vulnerability under congressional scrutiny.

His successor, Vizcarra, inherited both the presidency and the institutional conflict. His decision to dissolve Congress in 2019, though constitutional, intensified political polarisation. In November 2020, Congress removed him on grounds of “moral incapacity”, a constitutional provision that has since become central to Peru’s instability. This mechanism, broadly defined and politically contested, has enabled repeated presidential removals without the need for criminal conviction.

The short-lived presidency of Merino, lasting only five days, highlighted the limits of congressional legitimacy when faced with public opposition. Mass protests forced his resignation, leading Congress to appoint Sagasti as a transitional president. Sagasti’s administration restored a degree of stability, overseeing elections and completing a full interim mandate, which remains an exception in an otherwise turbulent decade.

The election of Castillo in 2021 once again raised expectations of political renewal. However, his presidency was characterised by persistent confrontation with Congress, frequent cabinet changes, and ongoing investigations. The crisis culminated in December 2022, when Castillo attempted to dissolve Congress and was immediately removed from office. His vice-president, Boluarte, assumed power, but her tenure was also marked by protests, governance challenges, and eventual removal by Congress in 2025.

The appointment of Jerí as interim president in 2025 continued the pattern of short-lived administrations. His removal in early 2026, following allegations of misconduct, reinforced the perception of systemic instability rather than isolated crises. Across these transitions, a consistent pattern emerges: presidents rarely complete their mandates, and leadership changes are driven more by institutional confrontation than by electoral cycles.

Several structural factors explain this phenomenon. Peru’s fragmented party system weakens executive support in Congress, while the constitutional provision of “moral incapacity” provides a flexible tool for removal. Additionally, corruption investigations have affected multiple administrations, further eroding public trust. These conditions create a political environment in which governance is often secondary to survival.

As Peru approaches new general elections , the primary expectation is not necessarily political transformation but institutional stabilisation. The key challenge for future leadership will be to establish a functional relationship between the executive and legislative branches. Without reforms that clarify constitutional ambiguities and strengthen party systems, the cycle observed over the past decade is likely to persist, regardless of electoral outcomes.

A new voting simulation reported by El Comercio shows Peru’s 2026 presidential race remains highly volatile just days before the April 12 election. The poll suggests no clear frontrunner, with several candidates clustered closely and a significant share of undecided voters. Analysts say the “electoral board keeps shifting” as alliances and late campaign dynamics influence voter preferences. The fragmented landscape reflects broader political instability following years of institutional crisis. Experts warn that the lack of a dominant candidate could lead to a highly contested second round. The findings underline the unpredictability of one of Peru’s most uncertain elections in recent history .

One dead and dozens injured in Lima stadium incident

At least one person has died, and dozens were injured following a crowd incident outside Lima’s Alejandro Villanueva Stadium ahead of a match involving Alianza Lima. Authorities ruled out any structural collapse, indicating the incident was caused by disorder among fans gathered for a pre-match event. Emergency services treated numerous injured people, several of them in critical condition, as investigations continue into the circumstances. Officials and club representatives pledged full cooperation to determine responsibility. Despite the incident, the domestic league confirmed the fixture would go ahead as planned. The tragedy has renewed concerns over crowd control and safety at major sporting events in Peru.

Peruvian engineer joins historic Artemis II moon mission

Peruvian engineer Jackelynne Silva Martinez has been highlighted for her role in NASA’s Artemis II, the mission set to orbit the Moon. Her participation marks a significant milestone for Peru’s presence in global space exploration. According to reports by La Republica, Silva Martínez is contributing to key engineering aspects of the programme. The mission is part of broader efforts to return humans to the Moon and pave the way for future Mars exploration. Her achievement has been widely celebrated as an inspiration for young scientists in Peru. Officials and academics emphasised the importance of investing in science and technology to build on such successes.

Mining exports surge driven by gold and copper

Peru’s mining exports recorded a sharp increase of 47.6% in December 2025, according to figures from the Ministry of Energy and Mines of Peru cited by La Republica. The growth was largely driven by strong international demand for gold and copper, the country’s main export commodities . The figures highlight the continued importance of the mining sector to Peru’s economy, accounting for a significant share of export revenues. Authorities noted that global market conditions and production levels both contributed to the surge. Economists say the trend could support economic recovery if sustained. However, they also stress the need for diversification to reduce dependence on raw materials.

Peruvian scientists highlight climate impact in Antarctica

A group of Peruvian researchers participating in Antarctic missions have warned about the growing impact of climate change on the continent’s megafauna. According to La Republica, the scientists—described as ambassadors of Peru and science—are studying how rising temperatures affect marine ecosystems and species survival. Their findings point to shifts in animal behaviour and habitat conditions linked to global warming. The research forms part of Peru’s ongoing scientific presence in Antarctica. Experts stress that such studies are crucial for understanding global climate patterns. The initiative also highlights Peru’s contribution to international environmental research efforts.

“The strength of unity is my national power,” he raps in the song, urging a fractured nation to come together. “Undivided Nepali, this time, history is being made.”

The track, titled Jai Mahakali, blends campaign footage with nationalist imagery, echoing themes that propelled his rise from Kathmandu mayor to national leader. Originally recorded more than a decade ago and remastered for release, the song leans heavily on calls for unity and renewal at a time of political upheaval.

“My heart is full of courage, my red blood is boiling; my brothers stand with me, this time we will rise,” Shah declares in another verse. “May my breath not run out, I will run like a leopard.”

The release marks Shah’s first public statement since his Rastriya Swatantra Party secured a sweeping victory in the March 5 election, the first since a deadly youth-led uprising in September 2025 toppled the previous government. At least 77 people were killed in protests initially triggered by a brief social media ban but fuelled by deeper anger over corruption and economic hardship.

At 35, Shah has emerged as a symbol of youth-driven political change in the Himalayan republic, maintaining the persona that first built his following: a sharply dressed rapper in dark sunglasses whose appeal cuts across a generation disillusioned with traditional politics .

The timing of the release appears deliberate. Endorsed as parliamentary party leader only hours earlier, Shah used the track to signal that his political identity will remain intertwined with his artistic roots — and that music will continue to be part of how he communicates with the public.

Sources close to him say two more songs are expected in the coming weeks, suggesting that even as he assumes the country’s highest office, he intends to keep speaking through rhythm as much as policy.

Outgoing interim prime minister Sushila Karki welcomed the transition, saying Nepal’s future lay with a younger generation that could “end corruption… [and] create jobs… [and deliver] economic development and social justice.”

For Shah, the message is already set — not from a podium, but from a verse.

The upcoming election stands out for the unusually high number of candidates. More than thirty contenders have registered to run, making it one of the most crowded presidential races in the country’s history . This reflects a highly fragmented political landscape, where parties are divided, and new political movements continue to emerge without clear dominance.

For many voters, the wide range of options has not necessarily translated into enthusiasm. Instead, it has contributed to confusion and scepticism, with a large portion of the electorate still undecided. Analysts suggest that this reflects a broader sense of disillusionment, as citizens struggle to identify candidates who can effectively address the country’s ongoing challenges.

The campaign itself has been marked by a limited focus on detailed policy proposals. While candidates have put forward a variety of ideas, critics argue that there has been little in-depth debate on key issues such as public security , corruption, and economic inequality. As a result, the election has often been characterised more by personalities than by clear political programmes.

Despite the political turmoil, Peru’s economy has remained relatively stable compared to other countries in the region. However, experts warn that continued instability could eventually affect investor confidence and economic performance, especially if the next government struggles to maintain consistent policies.

With no clear frontrunner likely to secure an outright majority, a second-round runoff appears almost certain. This means that alliances and voter mobilisation will play a crucial role in determining the final outcome. As election day approaches, Peru faces a critical moment that could either stabilise its political system or prolong a cycle of uncertainty.

A new poll published by El Tiempo places Gustavo Cepeda in the lead ahead of Colombia’s 2026 presidential election with 34.5% support. He is followed by Paloma Valencia on 22.2%, while Abelardo De La Espriella trails with 15%. The survey reflects an increasingly competitive political landscape, with significant fragmentation among opposition figures. Analysts suggest the results highlight shifting voter preferences and early consolidation around leading candidates. With the election still months away, the figures remain fluid but indicate a strong старт for Cepeda’s campaign. The poll also underscores the importance of alliances as candidates seek to broaden support.

Colombia strengthens leadership with CELAC-Africa forum

Colombia has hosted a high-level forum between the CELAC and African representatives, reinforcing its diplomatic leadership role. According to the Foreign Ministry, the initiative aims to deepen cooperation in trade, sustainability and political dialogue between both regions. Officials described the meeting as a milestone in South-South relations, positioning Colombia as a bridge between Latin America and Africa. The forum also focused on shared challenges such as climate change and economic development. Authorities stressed the importance of multilateralism in addressing global issues. The event is part of Bogotá’s broader strategy to expand its international influence.

Birth rate in Antioquia falls to lowest level in 18 years

New data reported by DANE shows that births in Antioquia dropped to their lowest level in nearly two decades during 2025. The decline reflects broader demographic trends across Colombia, including lower fertility rates and changing social dynamics. Experts attribute the drop to economic uncertainty, increased access to education and shifting family planning choices. The figures raise concerns about long-term impacts on the labour force and economic growth. Authorities are monitoring the trend as part of national demographic planning. The data highlights a significant transformation in population patterns within the region.

Four Clan del Golfo suspects arrested in major operation

Colombian authorities have captured four alleged members of the Clan del Golfo wanted by the United States on drug trafficking charges. The operation was carried out by national police in coordination with international agencies, marking a significant blow to the criminal network. Officials stated that the suspects were involved in large-scale narcotics operations linked to transnational routes. The arrests form part of ongoing efforts to dismantle organised crime structures in Colombia. Authorities emphasised continued cooperation with US law enforcement. The case underscores the persistent challenge posed by drug trafficking groups.

Dispute grows over claims in Uribe assassination case

Tensions have escalated following accusations related to the assassination of Miguel Uribe Uribe, with Ivan Cepeda demanding concrete evidence to support recent claims. The controversy has reignited political debate, with differing factions disputing interpretations of historical responsibility. Cepeda criticised what he described as unfounded allegations and called for a fact-based approach. The issue has drawn renewed public attention to one of Colombia’s most emblematic political crimes. Analysts warn that the dispute could deepen existing political divisions. The case remains a sensitive topic in the country’s historical memory.

Europe is not immune. In the coming weeks, Slovenia and Hungary will hold parliamentary elections that go far beyond routine political contests: they are a referendum on whether citizens will stop the normalisation of authoritarian power, or permit it to entrench itself at the heart of the European Union.

On March 22 in Slovenia and on April 12 in Hungary, our people will each face drastically contrasting visions of our future. On one side, the promise of a democratic and European future represented by liberal values and politics based on trust and consensus.

On the other, authoritarianism and destruction of our most fundamental democratic institutions.

Hungary knows this choice all too well, having lived this nightmare to become the EU’s worst performer in terms of press freedom, rule of law, electoral interference, and corruption . That is what happens when authoritarians like Viktor Orban and his Fidesz party dominate a nation’s politics for most of the past 30 years.

Slovenia has been more fortunate, but only because Orban’s authoritarian soulmate, Janez Jansa, has been electorally impotent, as his party, the SDS, has only been able to form a post-election coalition one time in the past 15 years.

Still, Jansa appears determined to pull out all the stops to reverse this losing trend and is relying on tried-and-true methods from Orban’s bag of dirty tricks that Hungarians know all too well. On Monday of this week, one of the most active NGOs in Slovenia called March 8, held a press conference at which they presented jaw-dropping proof that the Israeli firm Black Cube masterminded a series of secret recordings meant to discredit the current democratic coalition led by Prime Minister Robert Golob.

Hungary, of course, is no stranger to Black Cube’s dirty tricks, as they intervened similarly to help Viktor Orban cling to power in the past.

These manipulations, encouraged and financed by parts of the extreme American right, along with election interference by Russia in Romania and Moldova, are a direct affront to our national sovereignty. They must be defeated and rejected.

Hungarians know how sophisticated modern autocrats have become. They no longer rely only on open repression. They capture newsrooms through politically connected oligarchs, intimidate critical voices in the name of “sovereignty,” invent imaginary enemies, and slowly build a quasi-autocracy inside the European Union itself.

Slovenia must not be allowed to become the next case study in that method. No one from abroad should dictate to Slovenian citizens whom they should entrust with leading their country, just as no European nation should be forced to accept foreign-backed interference as the new normal.

This year’s campaign has shown how low the extreme authoritarian rights are prepared to go in the pursuit of power. They are not interested in the lives of people in this country. What they seek is total control — control over everyone and everything in society — and the ability to rule without limits.

Democracy can’t survive on inertia alone. Personal freedom is a value that must be nurtured and protected. Once fear is normalized, hatred follows, and hatred can turn into violence. That is not the future we want for our children in Slovenia, in Hungary, or anywhere in Europe. As European women elected to office to represent our fellow citizens, we are particularly aware of the danger and legacy of hate that pervades right-wing ideology in our region.

Most Slovenians – and most Hungarians – oppose this brand of politics and do not want to live in a country where the authorities suppress the freedoms of individuals or groups, silence different opinions at home, and at the same time behave submissively toward authoritarian regimes abroad.

In the coming weeks, our two countries have a chance to prove that this politics of manipulation, intimidation, and institutional corrosion can still be defeated in the most democratic way possible: by citizens who think for themselves, who refuse to surrender their sovereignty, and who turn out in large numbers to defend their freedom at the ballot box.

We love our respective nations and will not allow our sovereignty to be taken away now or ever. And we personally will never be submissive to anyone. We are convinced that the events of this campaign will only motivate free-thinking, proud and active citizens even more to participate in the elections in large numbers.

Slovenia and Hungary must remain an independent, confident and sovereign states. And when we prevail at home, we will also strike a victory for the rules-based order, for consensus-based foreign policy that respects vaulted institutions like the European Union and the United Nations.

This opinion article represents the views of its authors and publication does not imply endorsement by Global South World.

The main opposition parties did not field candidates, citing a lack of transparency. Two prominent opposition figures, General Jean-Marie Michel Mokoko and Andre Okombi Salissa, have been in jail for nearly a decade.

Ahead of the vote, human rights activists were arrested, several opposition parties were suspended, and public gatherings were closely monitored, according to Congolese human rights activist Joe Washington Ebina. Sunday's voting was also affected by late openings at some polling stations and a nationwide internet blackout.

More than 3.2 million Congolese were registered to vote. State television reported on Tuesday, March 17, a turnout of 84.65%, higher than the nearly 68% recorded in 2021, when Sassou won his previous five-year term with 88.4% of the vote.

Sassou's closest challenger, Mabio Mavoungou Zinga, a 69-year-old retired customs inspector and former member of parliament, secured 1.48% of the vote.

Defeated candidates have five days to file a challenge, while the Constitutional Court has 15 days to review them before announcing final results.

Sassou, a former paratrooper, first took power in 1979. He lost the country’s first multi-party elections in 1992 but returned to power in 1997 after a civil war. A constitutional change in 2015 removed term limits and the presidential age cap, allowing him to run for an additional five-year term. This latest term is expected to be his last, placing attention on succession within the ruling party.

The country’s economy, which depends heavily on oil, has stabilised in recent years after a prolonged downturn. Congo completed a three-year International Monetary Fund programme last year. However, over half of the population lives in poverty, and many lack reliable access to electricity, running water, and basic healthcare, according to the World Bank.

Congo has also faced ongoing allegations of corruption, with French and U.S. prosecutors investigating assets held abroad by members of Sassou’s close family. Rights groups state that political space has narrowed in recent years, pointing to arrests of activists and the suspension of political parties.

Vietnamese voters cast ballots on Sunday in a general election for the National Assembly, the country’s top legislative body that largely ratifies decisions by the ruling Communist Party. More than 73 million voters are electing 500 lawmakers and local council representatives in the five-yearly polls. About 93% of the 864 candidates are Communist Party members, while independents account for 7.5%, down from 8.5% in 2021, according to the national election council. The party currently holds 97% of parliamentary seats. Voters expressed hope representatives would support continued economic modernisation under top leader To Lam.

Flight cuts seen from April as China, Thailand halt jet fuel shipments

Vietnam has warned airlines to prepare for potential flight reductions from April after China and Thailand halted jet fuel exports amid the Iran war, raising the risk of shortages. Vietnam imports more than two-thirds of its jet fuel, with 60% supplied by China and Thailand. In a March 9 notice, the Civil Aviation Authority of Vietnam said shortages could begin in April and urged airlines to review operations, particularly domestic routes. Airport operators were also asked to prepare extra parking space if flights are cut. Importers Petrolimex and Skypec said they can guarantee supplies only through March, while deliveries from Singapore have also declined.

Homegrown Viettel is world’s strongest telecom brand in 2026

Vietnam’s Viettel has been ranked the world’s strongest telecommunications brand in 2026, with a Brand Strength Index score of 89.9 out of 100 and an AAA+ rating from consultancy Brand Finance. The result lifts the group to the top of the global telecom sector after placing second for two consecutive years. Brand strength measures customer trust, loyalty and engagement rather than financial value. Brand Finance said Viettel performed strongly on metrics including reputation, trust and customer recommendations. The company’s brand value stands at US$7.9 billion, making it Southeast Asia’s most valuable telecom brand and the only Vietnamese firm in the global Top 500 ranking.

Oil support from Japan, South Korea sought

Vietnam has asked Japan and South Korea to help expand its access to crude oil amid global supply disruptions caused by the Iran war, the trade ministry said on Monday. Deputy Industry and Trade Minister Nguyen Hoang Long made the request during an energy security summit in Tokyo over the weekend. Vietnam’s two refineries meet about 70% of domestic fuel demand and rely heavily on Middle Eastern crude. Long asked Japan to assist in identifying and securing crude supplies and discussed Japanese investment in liquefied natural gas and nuclear power. Vietnam imported 14.2 million tonnes of crude oil last year, up 5.3%, customs data showed.

Vietnam, Switzerland push to accelerate EFTA free trade pact talks

Vietnam and Switzerland have agreed to accelerate negotiations on a free trade agreement between Vietnam and the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), aiming to largely conclude discussions during the 20th negotiation round in Hanoi. Officials said both sides hope to announce the completion of talks by late June 2026 on the sidelines of an EFTA ministerial meeting in Iceland. Switzerland described Vietnam as an important partner and said the deal could boost investment, job creation and technology transfer. Vietnamese officials said the agreement would strengthen trade, supply chains and investment ties with Switzerland and other EFTA members, including Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein.

His rise marks a striking generational shift in a nation where political leadership has long been dominated by veteran figures from the same established parties.

He was a rapper

Long before entering politics, Balen Shah was known in Nepal’s music scene.

His rap songs often focused on corruption, inequality and frustrations with the country’s political system. The music helped him build a large following, particularly among younger audiences.

During last year’s protests, one of his songs — Nepal Haseko, Nepal Smiling — gained more than 10 million views on YouTube and became associated with the wider movement demanding political change.

Supporters later turned his image and lyrics into campaign symbols, with crowds chanting his name at rallies and singing campaign songs generated for social media.

He was an engineer

Before music and politics, Shah trained as a civil engineer.

After studying engineering in Kathmandu, he pursued a master’s degree in structural engineering at Visvesvaraya Technological University in Karnataka, India.

His professional background helped shape his political messaging. Throughout the campaign, he emphasised practical solutions to economic stagnation, highlighting issues such as job creation, education and healthcare for poorer Nepalis.

Nepal remains one of the poorer countries in the world, with limited job opportunities at home. Many young people leave the country each year to seek work abroad, often in difficult conditions.

He was Kathmandu’s mayor

Shah’s political breakthrough came in 2022, when he ran as an independent candidate for mayor of Kathmandu.

His victory shocked Nepal’s political establishment, defeating candidates from the country’s traditional parties.

As mayor, he became known for visible urban reforms in the capital. His administration launched clean-up drives, removed illegal structures and pushed programmes aimed at developing skills among young people.

However, his approach also drew criticism from rights groups, particularly over the use of police against street vendors as the city sought to clear roads and regulate informal businesses.

He became the face of a generational revolt

Shah’s rise to national prominence followed a wave of youth-led protests in September that toppled the government of veteran leader KP Sharma Oli.

The demonstrations began after the government imposed a ban on social media platforms but quickly expanded into wider protests against corruption and economic stagnation. At least 77 people were killed during the unrest.

In the election that followed, Shah’s Rastriya Swatantra Party rode a wave of anger towards the traditional political class.

Early results showed the party winning a majority of direct parliamentary seats, while Shah himself defeated the 74-year-old Oli in his own constituency.

Kasibante had asked the court on February 5, 2026, to withdraw both the main petition and a related application seeking access to backend electoral data held by the Electoral Commission. He said he lacked the funds for a nationwide forensic audit of election materials, including biometric voter verification systems and servers, and conceded that without the evidence he sought, the petition could not meet the required standard of proof.

The respondents, President Museveni, the Electoral Commission and the Attorney General, did not oppose the withdrawal but requested that the petition be dismissed with costs, saying they had spent significant resources defending the case.

The court said presidential election petitions are matters of high constitutional importance and warned they should not be filed casually, given the logistical and financial implications. It concluded that the evidence on record was insufficient to sustain the petition and ruled, "Presidential Election Petition No. 01 of 2026 is hereby withdrawn."

Veteran President Yoweri Museveni was declared the landslide winner of Uganda's presidential election in January, extending his rule into a fifth decade after a contest marred by violent incidents and allegations of fraud.

Uganda's electoral commission said Museveni had received just under 72% of the vote. His main challenger, the pop singer-turned-politician Bobi Wine, was credited with 24%.

“Including, far in Asia,” he replied. “I was very honored to see that a very wonderful Prime Minister in Japan won by a landslide. I think she was going to win, but she won by just about the biggest vote ever in Japan. And she attributed my endorsement for that.”

Trump’s remarks followed his public endorsement of Takaichi ahead of Sunday’s snap election. 

On Truth Social, he wrote that she has “already proven to be a strong, powerful, and wise leader… one that truly loves her country,” adding: “She will not let the people of Japan down!”

Takaichi, who became Japan’s first female prime minister after taking the helm of the ruling Liberal Democratic Party, had openly courted Trump as Tokyo sought stability in its relationship with Washington amid trade tensions.

Before her win, she said: “I am sincerely grateful to President Donald J. Trump for his warm words… The potential of our Alliance is LIMITLESS.”

After securing victory, she again thanked him directly: “Thank you, @realDonaldTrump, for your kind and encouraging message of congratulations. I look forward to working closely with you, Donald, to advance peace, strength, and prosperity for our two nations.”

Trump, without naming her in an earlier post, hailed Japan’s “first female Prime Minister, a highly respected person of great wisdom and strength.”

Whether Trump’s endorsement proved decisive is unclear.

But Takaichi’s nationalist platform and hardline rhetoric on immigration have drawn comparisons to the U.S. president — reinforcing the perception, at least among supporters, that Trump’s political brand now reaches well beyond America’s borders.

General Waker said the army had carried out its assigned responsibilities during the election period and was now awaiting instructions from the incoming administration.

The country has returned to democratic rule, he said, adding that the military would return to the barracks as soon as directed by the new government.

However, he noted that some troops would remain deployed temporarily to help maintain law and order until the police fully regain control of security operations.

This reflects an overwhelming acceptance of the recent polls ’ results, in which the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) won a decisive majority, securing 209 of 300 seats and giving it a two-thirds mandate to form the next government.

“The people of Bangladesh accept the result,” Bangladeshi journalist Samiur Rahman Sazzad told Global South World , dismissing criticisms from Hasina and her party in exile that the elections were a “well-planned farce” and were not inclusive.

After tight election security

Bangladesh’s army had been deployed nationwide in support of civilian authorities during the election, amid heightened political tensions. Additional forces sent out during the period have already been scaled back, according to meeting sources.

In his address, General Waker thanked army personnel for what he described as their professionalism and strong sense of responsibility while carrying out election duties.

“Whatever was necessary in the interest of the people has been completed,” he said. 

Referring to the military’s role in stabilising the political environment, he said the country and its people would remember the army’s service.

He also stressed the importance of maintaining discipline within the ranks, urging commanders to uphold the chain of command and sustain morale among troops.

The army chief cautioned personnel to remain vigilant against misinformation and disinformation, an issue that has become increasingly prominent during politically sensitive periods.

Bangladesh’s military has historically played a significant role during periods of political uncertainty, but General Waker’s remarks signal an intention to step back once the elected civilian leadership formally assumes office.

“I was very excited about today’s voting,” Sazzad, a journalist, told Global South World shortly after polls closed on Thursday. “It was like a new experience for us. After so many years, we finally had the chance.”

This year’s election marked Bangladesh’s first since the 2024 youth-led uprising that ended Hasina’s 17-year rule and forced the longtime premier into exile in India.

More than 127 million voters were registered for the parliamentary contest and a simultaneous referendum on constitutional reforms.

For many in Generation Z — those who came of age politically during Hasina’s tenure — the vote represented more than a routine democratic exercise. 

It was, in Sazzad’s words, an opportunity to help shape a “new Bangladesh.”

“They are the future of our country,” Sazzad said of the Bangladeshi youth. “They want to see some pragmatic changes in the future in Bangladesh. They never want to see any corruption. They never want to see any disruption to living their life.”

Polling centres in the capital were calm and heavily secured, with the military and other law enforcement agencies deployed nationwide, Sazzad said. 

Yet beneath the order, Bangladeshis were elated at the chance to witness a new political landscape, one they largely see as shaping their future.

“They are very happy and they were feeling like it's like Eid for us,” Sazzad said, referring to the Islamic holiday featuring feasts and prayers. “It was a sunny day in our country. The situation was very good.”

BNP win

The Bangladesh Nationalist Party secured a decisive parliamentary majority, winning 209 of 300 seats, giving the party a two-thirds mandate to form the next government .

For Samiur Rahman Sazzad, the outcome signals both continuity and opportunity. 

“BNP now has the chance to prove themselves,” he said, noting the party’s “very talented” leadership under Tarique Rahman, son of BNP founder Ziaur Rahman. 

Tarique, who returned from nearly two decades abroad, is seen as a charismatic figure capable of implementing the BNP’s 31-point election platform, including initiatives aimed at reducing social inequality, expanding access to food and education , and widening the tax base.

Sazzad emphasised that while the Awami League was barred from contesting, voter turnout — estimated at around 65% — reflects strong public engagement. 

“The people of Bangladesh accept the result,” he said, dismissing criticisms from Hasina and her party in exile that the elections were a “well-planned farce” and was not inclusive, considering Awami League was excluded.

Opposition voices, including Jamaat-e-Islami, have also largely signalled acceptance.

Gen Z future

While BNP claims power, Sazzad sees the next chapter of Bangladesh’s politics as still deeply influenced by Generation Z. 

Young voters, he said, remain committed to pragmatic reform and anti-corruption priorities, even as new actors like the student-led National Citizen Party (NCP) begin to emerge.

“The NCP is like an infant baby,” Sazzad explained. “They won five seats, but they have potential.” 

He predicts the party could capture dozens of constituencies in future elections, reflecting a generation eager for leaders who actively participated in the 2024 uprising that ousted Hasina.

For many young Bangladeshis, including first-time voters like Sazzad, the election is a first step toward what they hope will be a more transparent, equitable, and forward-looking Bangladesh.

The commission reminded broadcasters and the public that the Electoral Commission is the only constitutional body authorised to declare election outcomes in Uganda. Candidates who are dissatisfied with the results, it said, must challenge them in court within the legally prescribed timelines.

“Broadcast media should not serve as alternative venues for litigating election disputes,” the UCC said.

The regulator warned that airing unofficial results, parallel tallies or speculative allegations is unlawful and could create public panic, confusion and distrust in democratic institutions. It added that such broadcasts may also incite unrest and damage Uganda’s democratic reputation.

The UCC directed all broadcasters to exercise strict editorial oversight and ensure that election-related information is verified against official Electoral Commission sources. It also ordered media houses to refrain from hosting programmes that promote unsubstantiated claims about results.

The commission said it would take “decisive enforcement action” against any broadcaster that violates the law or the guidelines.

Media owners, editors and the public were urged to use broadcast platforms responsibly and in ways that promote national unity and democratic integrity.

This concludes our live coverage of the February 12 Bangladesh elections. Vote counting is currently in progress. Follow Global South World for further updates as we await the official results from the Bangladesh Election Commission.

10:59 GMT: Polls close in first election after 15 years

Vote counting is underway in Bangladesh following the nation’s first election since student-led protests led to the ousting of Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina in 2024.

10:10 GMT: What time do polls close?

Polls in Bangladesh’s general election will close at 4:30 p.m. local time (10:30 a.m. GMT). While voting began at 7:30 a.m., voters already in line at closing time will still be allowed to cast their ballots.

9:45 GMT: Voting continues across Bangladesh as election day progresses

8:00 GMT: Over 1.12 million postal ballots received

By 7:00 a.m. GMT (1:00 p.m. local time), the Bangladesh Election Commission reported that 1,125,382 postal ballots had reached returning officers under the country’s first technology-supported postal voting system. In total, over 1.528 million voters were approved to vote by post in this election.

7:48 GMT: Voting is currently underway in Bangladesh’s general election, with polling stations open across the country as citizens continue to cast their ballots.

7:44 GMT: Chief Adviser Professor Muhammad Yunus cast his ballot in the 13th general election and referendum on the July National Charter at the Gulshan Model School and College centre in Dhaka.

7:38 GMT: Around 540 foreign observers and journalists from major global organisations and media outlets, including BBC, Reuters, AP, Al Jazeera English, the European Union delegation, the Commonwealth Secretariat, ANFREL, IRI, among others, are monitoring the elections across the country.

5:20 GMT: BNP Chairman Tarique Rahman said the moment was long anticipated as he cast his ballot in Bangladesh’s defining 2026 general election. "People of Bangladesh have been waiting for this day," he said.

3:40 GMT: Tarique Rahman casts his vote in Bangladesh’s pivotal 13th parliamentary elections, marking a high-profile return to frontline politics for the BNP leader. The son of former prime minister Khaleda Zia voted at a Dhaka polling centre.

3:20 GMT: After casting his vote, Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami Ameer Shafiqur Rahman expressed hope that his party would establish a government genuinely selected by the people. “If the voting is held in a free and fair manner, we will accept the results. Others should also accept the verdict of the people,” he said.

2:50 GMT: Almost 1 million security personnel are on the ground today across Bangladesh, with surveillance cameras also installed in multiple sites to ensure the security of voters. These tight measures come as precincts remain “vulnerable to violence,” according to the electoral body.

2:30 GMT: Apart from the polls becoming the first to be held since Hasina was ousted, this year also marks the first time Bangladesh conducts a general election and a national referendum side by side. Thus, two ballots are used: white for the parliamentary elections and pink for the referendum.

1:50 GMT : While many voters are upbeat about the polls, considering it is the first to be held since the fall of the Hasina regime, some still express reservation over the shallow pool of candidates.

1:35GMT: Security is tight in Bangladesh, with reports from the ground indicating the deployment of striking teams to ensure voters can cast their ballots securely.

1:30 GMT: Voting opens in Bangladesh, in one of the most awaited and consequential polls for Asia in 2026, considering the size of the voting population and the political backdrop of the election.

Polls open at 7:30 a.m. (01:30 GMT) and close at 4:30 p.m. (10:30 GMT).

The Bangladesh Election Commission (BEC) extended the polling time by one hour overall—up from the previous 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. window—to accommodate the increased voting workload. This extra time is necessary because voters will be processing two separate ballots: a white ballot for the parliamentary election and a pink ballot for the national referendum.

Background

Bangladesh's 2026 elections mark the first vote since Sheikh Hasina’s ouster. An interim government will oversee the parliamentary polls and a national referendum on constitutional reforms. Key rivals include the BNP and Jamaat-e-Islami, while the Awami League remains barred.

How many voters are eligible?

A final voter list released by the Election Commission of Bangladesh indicates that approximately 127.7 million eligible citizens will participate in this election. Of these voters:

This is one of the largest electorates in South Asia . Many voters are also participating for the first time, including millions who turned 18 since the last election.

How many parties are contesting?

Candidates are contesting across 299 constituencies (after one constituency election was cancelled due to a candidate’s death). At least 51 political parties are participating, alongside independent candidates.

Major political players in this election include:

Electoral system and process

Voters are casting ballots in the 13th National Parliamentary Election (Jatiya Sangsad) to elect members of parliament. Alongside the general election, a national referendum on political reforms, covering issues like executive limits and governance accountability, is also being held.

Bangladesh uses a first-past-the-post (FPTP) electoral system. Each of the 300 seats in parliament is contested in a single-member constituency: the candidate with the most votes in each wins the seat. After the election, 50 additional seats are reserved for women and allocated to parties based on their share of the elected seats, in line with constitutional provisions.

Polling is taking place simultaneously nationwide from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on election day, with transparent ballot boxes used at each centre.

Polling stations and logistics

The Election Commission has finalised over 42,700 polling centres across the country, each serving roughly 3,000 voters on average. In total, there are more than 247,000 polling booths staffed by thousands of electoral officials to ensure the voting process runs smoothly.

For the first time, Bangladesh has introduced a digital postal voting platform (“Postal Vote BD” app) to facilitate voting by citizens living abroad, government officials on duty outside the country, and others eligible for postal ballots

When will results be announced?

Counting of votes typically begins soon after polling stations close at 4:30 p.m. on election day. Preliminary results are expected to begin emerging later that evening and may continue into the early hours of the following day.

The official and full results are usually announced over the next 24–48 hours as constituencies report in. (This pattern reflects recent practice in Bangladeshi elections; specific times are set by the Election Commission.

Absence of Awami League

Following the ouster of Sheikh Hasina in 2024, the party's registration and electoral activities were suspended. The party has been banned from all political activities and will not participate in the upcoming elections under its electoral symbol.

The absence of the Awami League—historically one of Bangladesh's largest and most influential political parties—is considered a highly significant shift in the country's political landscape. Experts note that a central challenge for the next government will be determining the future of the party and how long the substantial segment of the electorate aligned with it can remain politically excluded.

Brief history of elections in Bangladesh

The country’s first general election was held on 7 March 1973, just two years after independence, with the Awami League winning an overwhelming majority of seats in the new national parliament, the Jatiya Sangsad. That election helped establish the foundations of parliamentary democracy in the young nation.

A key turning point came with the 1991 general election, widely viewed as a return from military rule to civilian parliamentary democracy. That election brought the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) to power and established a pattern of alternating rule between BNP and the Awami League, which would shape politics into the 2000s.

The January 2024 election, held under Hasina’s administration, saw the Awami League win a large majority amid low turnout and a boycott by major opposition parties. This period culminated in nationwide protests and unrest that ultimately led to her removal from power later that year.

Now, the 2026 election is the first major vote after the end of long-term dominance by a single leader and in a political environment shaped by mass protest, calls for reform, and efforts to strengthen democratic legitimacy.

According to the Election Commission of Bangladesh (ECB), over 127 million voters will cast their votes across 42,761 polling centres in 64 districts for 300 parliamentary constituencies. 

The scale of the win clears the way for Takaichi to push through legislation with minimal resistance, after she called a snap election just weeks into her premiership. It also allows her to override the upper house, which remains outside LDP control.

Market reaction was almost instantaneous. 

Japan’s Nikkei index hit a fresh record, rising nearly 4% to close above 56,000 points, as investors welcomed the prospect of political stability and faster policy decisions.

The rally spread across Asia, with gains in South Korea, Hong Kong and Australia , underscoring the regional impact of Japan’s election outcome.

Takaichi has promised a ¥21 trillion ($134 billion) stimulus package and a two-year suspension of Japan’s food sales tax, measures aimed at easing cost-of-living pressures but which have raised concerns about funding.

The election result also drew praise from U.S. President Donald Trump, who congratulated Takaichi on what he called a “historic” victory and applauded her conservative leadership.

Trump said Japan’s voters had delivered a clear mandate, adding that he looked forward to working with Takaichi on security and economic issues.

“She is a highly respected and very popular Leader. Sanae’s bold and wise decision to call for an Election paid off big time,” the U.S. president wrote on Truth Social.

“Sanae: It was my Honor to Endorse you and your Coalition,” he added. 

Unlike previous elections , the appointed Senate will no longer participate in selecting the prime minister. A candidate for premier needs at least 251 votes in the House to assume office. 

Voters will also cast a referendum ballot on whether to rewrite the 2017 constitution.

What are the main parties?

How will the elections be conducted?

While voting occurs on February 8, the prime minister will not be elected immediately. 

Results must first be certified by the Election Commission, which has up to 60 days to confirm at least 95% of MPs — 475 of 500 — before Parliament can convene. This step is expected by April 9.

The first parliamentary session will follow, likely after the Songkran Festival, to elect the Speaker and Deputy Speakers. The Speaker plays a key role in controlling proceedings, setting agendas, and formally proposing the prime minister to the King.

The prime minister’s election in early May 2026 will reflect the outcome of coalition negotiations. A party or alliance must secure at least 251 votes in the House. Forming a stable government may be difficult, as no single party is expected to win a majority.

Once the prime minister is elected, the Cabinet will be formed and ministers appointed by royal decree. 

The new government must present its policy statement to Parliament within 15 days, after which it can fully exercise authority. If the process proceeds smoothly, Thailand should have a fully functioning government by mid-June 2026.

What are the pressing issues?

What’s next?

Thailand’s election is widely viewed as a test of whether the country can break its cycle of political instability, coups, and judicial interventions. However, even with high voter turnout, analysts have cautioned that forming a stable government will be challenging unless a party achieves a convincing majority.

Thus, February 8 vote marks the start of a complex transition of state power. 

Over the next four months, the certification of results, parliamentary convening, prime minister selection, and Cabinet formation will determine whether Thailand can achieve political stability or continue its pattern of turbulence.

The lawyers argued that Uganda breached the Commonwealth Charter and the Harare Declaration, which commit member states to democratic governance, respect for human rights , the rule of law and free political participation.

Allegations linked to the election

The petition centres on Uganda’s January 15, 2026, general election and its aftermath. According to the lawyers, the period was marked by mass arrests of opposition supporters, the use of force against civilians, restrictions on communications and sustained pressure on opposition leaders.

Several members of Bobi Wine’s National Unity Platform (NUP) were arrested during the campaign and around election day. Many were detained at roadblocks or during raids on party offices, while others were charged with offences such as inciting violence . The party says many of those arrested were its polling agents.

There are also reports that hundreds of people were detained after the election. The Ugandan military has said the arrests were based on violations of the law and denies that they were politically motivated.

Threats against the opposition

A major concern raised in the submission is public statements made by Gen Muhoozi Kainerugaba, Uganda’s Chief of Defence Forces, who is also President Yoweri Museveni’s son.

In posts on social media, Gen Muhoozi claimed that the army had killed supporters of Bobi Wine and said the opposition leader would be “next.” Bobi Wine has said the military invaded his home during this period and that his family was left feeling unsafe. The army has denied occupying his residence.

The lawyers further argued that such statements amount to credible threats and that the Ugandan state has a duty under both domestic and international law to protect political opponents.

Benjaporn Maigate, a street food vendor in Chiang Rai, said money offered during campaigns does little to solve daily struggles.

“There’s a lot of money being thrown around to buy votes, but what people really need are policies that reduce the cost of living, especially electricity and fuel,” she said . She added that her family refuses to accept money in exchange for votes. “If someone tries to buy our vote, we shut the door on them,” she said.

Similar views were shared in Thailand’s north-east, known as Isan, where agriculture remains central to the economy. Farmer Rungnapa Kongsui from Ubon Ratchathani said cash handouts bring only short-lived relief.

“The happiness from money lasts only for a short time,” she said. “But if you support jobs, careers and markets, people will remember that forever.”

The shift in attitudes matters because nearly 25 million voters live in the North and North-east, which together account for 170 of Thailand’s 500 parliamentary seats. While these regions have traditionally backed the Pheu Thai party, recent elections have shown more mixed results.

Voters say empty promises and short-term giveaways are no longer enough. Farmer Saksayam Lakkan, who returned home after working abroad, said real change depends on education and technology. “If the government actually promoted technology and educated the new generation of farmers, we could develop and have a better life,” he said.

The election also includes a referendum on whether to amend Thailand’s 2017 military-era constitution, a process many voters view with scepticism after repeated failed attempts. Political analyst Purawich Watanasukh from Thammasat University said years of stalled reforms have left voters fatigued and wary of grand promises.