<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:base="https://globalsouthworld.com/rss/tag/Daniel%20Ortega" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <atom:link href="https://www.globalsouthworld.com/rss/tag/Daniel%20Ortega" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <title>Global South World - Daniel Ortega</title>
    <link>https://www.globalsouthworld.com/rss/tag/Daniel%20Ortega</link>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <description><![CDATA[News, opinion and analysis focused on the Global South and rising nations across the world. Delivered by journalists on the ground in Africa, Asia, Europe and the Americas. From politics and business to technology, science and social issues, Global South World is the first place to come for accurate and trusted information.]]></description>
    <item>
      <title>Nicaragua Roundup: US sanctions Ortega’s family, CIDH demands end to repression, Dengue vaccine trials with Russia</title>
      <link>https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/nicaragua-roundup-us-sanctions-ortegas-family-cidh-demands-end-to-repression-dengue-vaccine-trials-with-russia</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/nicaragua-roundup-us-sanctions-ortegas-family-cidh-demands-end-to-repression-dengue-vaccine-trials-with-russia</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2026 17:29:24 Z</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[<h3>US  sanctions  Ortega’s family over alleged corruption network</h3>
<p>The United States has imposed sanctions on relatives of Daniel Ortega, targeting members of his inner circle over alleged involvement in opaque business dealings. Measures focus on restricting financial access and international operations linked to key economic sectors. Washington argues the measure is aimed at increasing pressure on the government without directly harming the wider  population . Analysts say the sanctions reflect a broader strategy to weaken entrenched power structures surrounding the ruling family. The move comes amid continued international concern over governance and transparency in Nicaragua. It also signals ongoing tensions between Managua and Western governments.</p>
<h3>Rights body demands end to violations and democratic restoration</h3>
<p>The Inter-American Commission on Human Rights has called on Nicaragua’s government to cease human rights violations and restore democratic institutions. In a recent statement, the body warned that serious abuses persist amid a prolonged political crisis. It highlighted ongoing concerns over arbitrary detentions and restrictions on  civil liberties . The commission urged authorities to guarantee fundamental rights and reopen democratic space. Observers say the statement adds to mounting international pressure on Managua. The government has yet to signal any policy shift in response.</p>
<h3>Nicaragua and Russia to test dengue vaccine</h3>
<p>Nicaragua is preparing to collaborate with Russia on trials for a dengue vaccine, as part of efforts to tackle a growing public health challenge. Officials confirmed that preliminary steps are underway, although details about trial locations and timelines remain unclear. The initiative reflects closer bilateral ties between Managua and Moscow in recent years. Health experts note that dengue remains a major concern across tropical regions, increasing the importance of vaccine development. Authorities say the project could strengthen national healthcare capacity. However, further information is still pending as preparations continue.</p>
<h3>Opposition calls for democratic transition</h3>
<p>Opposition groups have issued a declaration calling for a democratic transition in Nicaragua, urging greater international involvement. The coalition argues that sustained pressure is needed to address what it describes as systemic repression. Leaders highlighted the need for free elections, institutional reform and the restoration of political freedoms. The announcement reflects continued mobilisation among opposition movements, many operating from exile. Analysts say unity among opposition factions remains a key challenge. The statement underscores ongoing political tensions within the country.</p>
<h3>US sanctions interior ministry official</h3>
<p>The United States has also sanctioned a senior official within Nicaragua’s interior ministry, intensifying pressure on the government. The measures target individuals accused of involvement in repression and abuses against political opponents. Washington has increasingly focused on specific figures linked to  security  and judicial structures. Officials said the sanctions aim to hold those responsible accountable while signalling support for democratic principles. The move forms part of a wider pattern of targeted measures against the Nicaraguan leadership. The government has rejected such actions as external interference.</p>
]]></description>
      <source url="https://www.globalsouthworld.com">Global South World</source>
      <media:content url="https://gsw.codexcdn.net/assets/ase5bawcAn9bOOPQp.jpg?width=1280&amp;height=720&amp;quality=75&amp;r=fill&amp;g=no" medium="image" type="image/jpeg">
        <media:credit role="photographer">POOL</media:credit>
        <media:credit role="provider">X80003</media:credit>
        <media:title>FILE PHOTO: Nicaragua's President Daniel Ortega in Cuba</media:title>
      </media:content>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Lucía Aliaga]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What’s frustrating Americans politically? </title>
      <link>https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/whats-frustrating-americans-politically</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/whats-frustrating-americans-politically</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2026 19:48:56 Z</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>The  United States  has dominated headlines in recent years, but rarely for calm or consensus. </p>
<p>According to 2017 data, across the country, states struggled with different pressures, each striving in its own way to make sense of a fast-moving and deeply polarised political climate.</p>
<h2> The five issues driving frustration</h2>
<p>Each state is coloured according to the issue most frequently cited by residents as their biggest source of political frustration on the above map.</p>
<p>Across much of the South, Southwest, and West Coast, immigration emerges as the leading concern. States such as California, Texas, Arizona, Florida, and  New York  show high levels of frustration with immigration policy.</p>
<p>This aligns with reporting from the  Pew Research Centre , which consistently finds immigration to be one of the most polarising national issues, particularly in border states and regions with large immigrant populations. Debates over border security, asylum policy, and labour migration have kept immigration at the centre of US politics for over a decade.</p>
<p>Several Midwestern and Mountain states, including Colorado, Wyoming, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, show civil rights as the top frustration.</p>
<p>Civil rights concerns often include voting access, freedom of speech, gun rights, and equality under the law. According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), these issues tend to rise during periods of political polarisation or when state-level legislation directly affects personal freedoms.</p>
<p>States such as Pennsylvania, Georgia, Tennessee, Missouri, Illinois, and Maine are marked by frustration over racial injustice.</p>
<p>This reflects long-running national conversations around policing, systemic racism, and economic inequality. Data from the Pew Research Centre and Brookings Institution show that concern about racial inequality increased sharply in the years following high-profile incidents of police violence and mass protests, particularly between 2014 and 2020.</p>
<p>In states like Iowa, Arkansas, Kentucky, West Virginia, and North Dakota, healthcare is the most cited frustration.</p>
<p>These concerns often relate to access, affordability, and rural healthcare shortages. According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, rural states and lower-income regions are more likely to report dissatisfaction with healthcare systems, hospital closures, and insurance costs.</p>
<p>A smaller number of states, including Nebraska, highlight frustration with executive leadership. This category typically reflects dissatisfaction with presidential authority, government accountability, and the balance of power between branches of government.</p>
<p>It is 2026, and these frustrations are yet to be nonexistent. From President Donald Trump’s repeated tariff threats to ongoing controversies around immigration enforcement, including ICE detentions and deaths in custody, many Americans are left feeling overwhelmed.</p>
<p>In Minnesota, protests against ICE operations have drawn national attention, particularly in and around Minneapolis, where demonstrators have gathered outside detention facilities and government buildings to oppose arrests, deportations, and what they describe as overly aggressive enforcement tactics. </p>
<p>Tensions escalated further following the death of  Alex Pretti . On 24 January 2026, the 37-year-old intensive care nurse and U.S. citizen was fatally shot by federal immigration agents during a confrontation in south Minneapolis. Federal officials say Pretti resisted arrest and approached agents with a handgun. </p>
<p>But bystander video reviewed by multiple outlets shows him unarmed, holding a phone, and attempting to intervene amid a chaotic scene before agents pepper-sprayed and tackled him, then fired multiple shots. This marked at least the second death of a U.S. resident in federal immigration operations in Minnesota in January, following the killing of Renée Nicole Good earlier in the month.</p>
<p>Civil rights organisations and community leaders have demanded transparent investigations, while federal authorities have said the incident is under review. The case has become a focal point for wider concerns about the use of force and oversight in immigration operations.</p>
]]></description>
      <source url="https://www.globalsouthworld.com">Global South World</source>
      <media:content url="https://gsw.codexcdn.net/assets/asfQe23BCHWNzL2CC.png?width=1280&amp;height=720&amp;quality=75&amp;r=fill&amp;g=no" medium="image" type="image/png">
        <media:title>SnapInsta.to_623422237_904340125878104_8979345290565671156_n</media:title>
      </media:content>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Abigail Johnson Boakye]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When a prime minister sang the wrong national anthem: The Belgian incident that went global</title>
      <link>https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/when-a-prime-minister-sang-the-wrong-national-anthem-the-belgian-incident-that-went-global</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/when-a-prime-minister-sang-the-wrong-national-anthem-the-belgian-incident-that-went-global</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2026 23:57:16 Z</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>National anthems are meant to symbolise unity, identity, and shared  history . That is why moments involving them, especially at the highest levels of government, tend to draw intense public attention. </p>
<p>One such moment occurred in Belgium and remains one of the most unusual political gaffes involving a national anthem.</p>
<p>In 2007,  Yves Leterme , then Belgium’s prime minister-designate, was asked during an interview to sing the Belgian national anthem, La Brabançonne. Instead, he sang La Marseillaise, the national anthem of France.</p>
<p>The moment was broadcast publicly and quickly spread across international media. What might have been a minor slip became a symbol of deeper political tensions within Belgium.</p>
<h3>Why the mistake struck a nerve</h3>
<p>Belgium is a country with long-standing linguistic and cultural divisions, primarily between Dutch-speaking Flanders and French-speaking Wallonia. The national anthem itself exists in  three official languages  and represents a fragile sense of national cohesion.</p>
<p>Singing  France ’s anthem, even unintentionally, was seen by some as symbolic rather than merely accidental.</p>
<p>The reaction was swift. Belgian media debated the meaning of the incident, while opposition figures questioned Leterme’s suitability for leadership. Supporters argued it was a human error blown out of proportion.</p>
<p>Leterme later acknowledged the mistake and attempted to downplay it, reportedly joking that it proved how well Belgians know their neighbours. However, the episode remained attached to his political image for years.</p>
]]></description>
      <source url="https://www.globalsouthworld.com">Global South World</source>
      <media:content url="https://gsw.codexcdn.net/assets/asAYeMd71MmloMOkZ.jpg?width=1280&amp;height=720&amp;quality=75&amp;r=fill&amp;g=no" medium="image" type="image/jpeg">
        <media:title>SnapInsta.to_622313588_18069133322449614_5989837409514072776_n</media:title>
      </media:content>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Abigail Johnson Boakye]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>United States and Argentina exit World Health Organisation - Who is next?</title>
      <link>https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/united-states-and-argentina-exit-world-health-organisation-who-is-next</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/united-states-and-argentina-exit-world-health-organisation-who-is-next</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 23:47:04 Z</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[<p>On 22 January 2026, the United States officially  completed its withdrawal  from the World Health Organisation, ending nearly 80 years of membership in the agency it helped found in 1948. </p>
<p>Washington’s departure follows a formal notification of intent submitted by President Donald Trump one year earlier, as required under U.S. law. The move makes the U.S. the first country in WHO history to withdraw its membership.</p>
<p>The Trump administration justified the exit by citing disagreements with the WHO’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, accusations of political bias, and dissatisfaction with pandemic policies. </p>
<p>Senior U.S. officials argued the country would continue to engage in global  health  through bilateral agreements and existing partnerships outside WHO structures.</p>
<p>"The Trump Admin is working to make sure that we have those bilateral agreements in place for that kind of health cooperation — but we don't need the WHO as an intermediary essentially to push Chinese interests on the American people," National Institutes of Health's Director Jay Bhattacharya told Fox News.</p>
<p>That rationale echoes what Argentinian President Javier Milei has stated in his decision to also  withdraw Argentina from the WHO , a move scheduled to take effect on March 17, 2026. </p>
<p>The Milei government has framed its exit as a defence of national sovereignty and a response to what it describes as “deep differences” with WHO policies, especially concerning the management of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
<p>Argentina’s annual financial contributions to WHO have been  comparatively small , and Buenos Aires has claimed that its withdrawal will not disrupt domestic health services. </p>
<p>Critics, however, warn that leaving a global coordination platform could limit access to information sharing, vaccine procurement mechanisms and technical cooperation that support responses to outbreaks and endemic diseases.</p>
<h3>Why WHO matters</h3>
<p>The World Health Organisation is the specialised health agency of the United Nations. Its core mission includes:</p>
<p>Nearly all United Nations member states have traditionally been members of the WHO. As of early 2026, with the U.S. exit complete, the organisation retains 193 members, the vast majority of the world’s nations.</p>
]]></description>
      <source url="https://www.globalsouthworld.com">Global South World</source>
      <media:content url="https://gsw.codexcdn.net/assets/aslCY6SOa79O0zqC4.jpg?width=1280&amp;height=720&amp;quality=75&amp;r=fill&amp;g=no" medium="image" type="image/jpeg">
        <media:title>SnapInsta.to_622071012_18068826380449614_2948061375483544424_n</media:title>
      </media:content>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Abigail Johnson Boakye]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nicaragua Roundup: Dual nationality ban, political prisoners, religious persecution claims</title>
      <link>https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/nicaragua-roundup-dual-nationality-ban-political-prisoners-religious-persecution-claims</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.globalsouthworld.com/article/nicaragua-roundup-dual-nationality-ban-political-prisoners-religious-persecution-claims</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 12:18:14 Z</pubDate>
      <description><![CDATA[<h2>Nicaragua passes constitutional reform ending dual nationality</h2>
<p>Nicaragua’s National Assembly approved a constitutional reform stating that Nicaraguan nationality will be lost when another nationality is acquired, after passing the measure in a second and final legislature on Wednesday, January 14, 2026. The  reform  modifies Articles 23 and 25 of the Constitution, including a new requirement that foreigners seeking naturalisation must renounce their nationality of origin. The reform was proposed as urgent by Nicaragua’s co-presidents Daniel Ortega and Rosario Murillo, who argued that nationality is a “sacred pact of loyalty” and that “there cannot be double fidelity.” Opposition groups in exile, including Unamos, condemned the change as a new escalation in the Ortega-Murillo government’s authoritarian policies and warned that it increases uncertainty for Nicaraguans abroad who have acquired another citizenship.</p>
<h2>US calls for unconditional release of all political prisoners</h2>
<p>On January 17, 2026, the United States  demanded  that Nicaragua’s government “unconditionally” release all political prisoners, following the reported release on January 10 of at least 24 dissidents and critics of the Sandinista executive. The US State Department’s Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs said the release must happen “without exceptions, without house arrest, without new detentions,” adding that freedom requires ending what it described as a cycle of repression. Nicaragua had announced the release of “dozens” of detainees, according to humanitarian groups, as the government marked the 19th anniversary of Ortega’s return to power, amid renewed pressure from Washington.</p>
<h2>Over 60 detained after social media reactions to Maduro’s capture</h2>
<p>Rights monitors reported a new wave of arbitrary detentions in early January, targeting people  accused  of expressing opinions online after the reported US military capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, an ally of Ortega and Murillo. The civil network Monitoreo Azul y Blanco said at least 60 Nicaraguans were detained between January 3 and 9, without judicial orders, across multiple departments, including Managua, Matagalpa, Chinandega, Estelí, Masaya, Granada, Jinotega, and Chontales, as well as the North and South Caribbean regions. The organisation said 49 remained detained without clarity on their legal situation, while others were temporarily held or released. US officials criticised the arrests as evidence of government paranoia, saying some people were detained simply for “liking” posts on social media.</p>
<h2>List of 24 political prisoners released includes cases not previously registered</h2>
<p>The Mechanism for the Recognition of Political Prisoners  said  in an update on January 11 that 24 people were confirmed released on January 10, including six not previously listed among the group’s official count of detainees, suggesting underreporting of politically motivated arrests. The mechanism said more than 40 political prisoners remain detained. Reports also said some of those released are banned from using social media, required to report daily to police stations, and must notify authorities in advance if leaving their municipality. Among those released were evangelical pastor Rudy Palacios Vargas and several family members, as well as former judiciary workers identified by political prisoner groups.</p>
<h2>Nicaraguan lawyer urges tougher action over religious persecution claims</h2>
<p>Nicaraguan lawyer and Catholic researcher Martha Patricia Molina has  urged  the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) to focus increased attention on Nicaragua, warning that public prayer is treated as a crime in the country. Speaking at a January 13 hearing in Washington, Molina said she has documented thousands of alleged attacks since April 2018 against priests, nuns, and laypeople. She claimed the authorities harass altar boys, monitor religious communities, restrict the entry of Bibles, and control Catholic religious materials. Molina also alleged that numerous institutions have been shut down and that hundreds of priests and nuns have been forced into exile or blocked from returning, significantly reducing the number of clergy serving in some dioceses. USCIRF officials stated that they continue to evaluate global conditions related to religious freedom and advocate for stronger accountability mechanisms where necessary.</p>
]]></description>
      <source url="https://www.globalsouthworld.com">Global South World</source>
      <media:content url="https://gsw.codexcdn.net/assets/asmtdc7KZ4eFN90xY.jpg?width=1280&amp;height=720&amp;quality=75&amp;r=fill&amp;g=no" medium="image" type="image/jpeg">
        <media:credit role="photographer">Oswaldo Rivas</media:credit>
        <media:credit role="provider">REUTERS</media:credit>
        <media:title>FILE PHOTO: Nicaraguan President Ortega and then-Vice President Murillo gesture during a march in Managua</media:title>
      </media:content>
      <dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Sakyi]]></dc:creator>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>