A summary of the average monthly pensions across Europe highlights just how wide that gap has become. At the top sits Iceland, where retirees receive more than €3,100 ($3,645) a month on average. At the lower end of the high-income bracket, countries like Ireland and Belgium hover just above €2,000 ($2,351).

According to OECD and Eurostat data, Northern and Western European countries consistently rank highest in pension payouts.

Iceland leads with roughly €3,169 per month per beneficiary, followed by Luxembourg (€2,868) and Denmark (€2,545). Norway and Switzerland also sit comfortably above €2,300.

These countries share a common model, and that is a strong public pension system combined with occupational and private schemes. OECD analysis shows that multi-pillar pension systems, where state support is supplemented by employer-backed and private savings, tend to deliver higher retirement incomes.

There is also a broader economic context where higher wages during working life translate into larger contributions and, ultimately, higher pensions.

Countries such as Austria (€2,156), the Netherlands (€2,118) and Belgium (€2,021) fall slightly behind the Nordic leaders but remain above the €2,000 mark.

Eurostat data indicate that these countries benefit from mature social security systems with wide coverage, though replacement rates, the share of income maintained after retirement, vary depending on career length and contribution history.

Ireland, at around €2,005, rounds out the group. While its public pension is relatively modest, it is often supplemented by private retirement savings, which OECD reports say are increasingly important across Europe.

Why the gap exists

The variation in pension levels comes down to a few key factors:

Eurostat has repeatedly warned that Europe’s ageing population will intensify these pressures in the coming decades, with the ratio of working-age people to retirees continuing to shrink.

However, Higher pensions do not automatically mean better living standards.

Countries like Switzerland and Norway, while offering higher monthly payouts, also have significantly higher costs of living. OECD comparisons show that purchasing power can vary widely, meaning €2,000 in one country may stretch further than €3,000 in another.

Customers are presented with meals in items such as plastic stools, buckets, bottles, and even weighing scales. The unusual presentation has become central to the dining experience, with many visitors arriving out of curiosity. 

"They have served my food in a watering can, which is quite exciting and unusual. The taste is great, which I really like," said one customer. 

The concept relies on unpredictability, with diners unsure of how their meals will be served each time they visit. This element of surprise has contributed to the restaurant’s growing popularity.

"It feels quite adventurous to eat at Kraprao Wat Jai, as we’re always excited to see how they serve the food. Today, it was presented on a small child’s chair, and it tasted very good," said another consumer.

Co-owner Baiplu said the idea began informally when her partner, Pum, experimented with unusual serving methods as a joke among friends. The approach quickly gained attention and became part of the restaurant’s identity.

"This place has been open for about 9-10 years," she said, adding, "Our customers come from all over, mainly from out of town, including students and a wide variety of people ."

Food may be served in items ranging from small bathtubs and birdcages to metal pans and large jars, reinforcing the unpredictable nature of the experience. 

Despite the focus on presentation, diners continue to praise the flavour of the Pad Krapow, which is available with pork, beef, or seafood.

Orders are placed by using a rubber chicken to call staff, while the simple, street-style setting continues to attract both local residents and tourists.

Poland is expected to allocate around 4.5% of its gross domestic product (GDP) to defence in 2025, the highest share among NATO allies, according to recent estimates compiled by defence analysts and data platforms, including Atlas Institute and reported by Euronews.

The surge reflects a broader shift across the alliance, where governments are under growing pressure to meet or exceed NATO’s benchmark of spending at least 2% of GDP on defence.

Countries on NATO’s eastern flank, closest to Russia , dominate the top of the spending rankings. Lithuania (4.0%), Latvia (3.7%) and Estonia (3.4%) are all projected to significantly exceed the alliance’s 2% target.

What this signals is a strategic recalibration. Since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022, frontline states have moved rapidly to strengthen military readiness, expand troop numbers and modernise equipment.

Euronews reports that defence budgets across Europe have seen sustained increases, with many governments committing to multi-year spending plans focused on air defence systems, artillery and ammunition stockpiles.

The United States , NATO’s largest military power, is expected to spend about 3.2% of GDP on defence in 2025—lower than several Eastern European allies in proportional terms but still far higher in absolute spending.

Northern European countries are also stepping up. Norway (3.3%) and Denmark (3.2%) are among the top contributors, reflecting growing concerns over Arctic security and regional stability.

Meanwhile, major Western European economies such as the United Kingdom and Germany are projected to spend around 2.4% of GDP, signalling progress after years of criticism for underinvestment.

Germany, in particular, has pledged a long-term shift in defence policy following its €100 billion special fund announced after the Ukraine invasion, a move widely covered by Euronews as a turning point in European security policy.

A notable development is that nearly all NATO members reached the 2% GDP benchmark in 2025. Countries including France, Italy, Canada and Spain hit that threshold, marking a significant change from just a few years ago when many allies fell short.

According to maritime analyses and industry insights reported by Marine Insight , canals serve as strategic connectors between seas, rivers, and industrial regions, reducing transit times and fuel costs while easing congestion around longer natural routes.

The Panama Canal, which stretches roughly 82 km, remains one of the most economically vital waterways globally. It links the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, saving ships from the lengthy and hazardous journey around South America ’s Cape Horn. Despite its relatively modest length, its geopolitical and commercial significance is outsized.

Similarly, Europe’s Kiel Canal in Germany, measuring just over 98 km, is one of the world’s busiest artificial waterways, allowing vessels to bypass the Danish Straits and significantly cut transit time between the North Sea and the Baltic Sea.

Russia’s Volga–Don Canal, at approximately 101 km, plays a key role in connecting the Caspian Sea basin with global shipping routes, forming part of a larger inland water transport network that supports regional trade.

Further north, Sweden’s historic Göta Canal, spanning about 193 km, is less commercially dominant today but remains a notable engineering achievement and an important cultural waterway.

However, Egypt ’s Suez Canal, also around 193 km long, is a cornerstone of global trade. It provides the shortest maritime route between Europe and Asia, handling a significant share of the world’s container traffic. Disruptions to the canal, as seen in recent years, have demonstrated its critical role in supply chains and energy shipments.

Longer inland systems, such as the Illinois Waterway in the United States (over 540 km) and the Erie Canal (around 582 km), highlight the importance of canals in domestic trade. These waterways connect major river systems and industrial hubs, facilitating the movement of bulk goods like grain, coal, and petroleum.

Towering above all is China’s Grand Canal, extending approximately 1,777 km. Recognised as the world's longest canal, it links key economic regions from Beijing to Hangzhou. According to Marine Insight, the Grand Canal has historically supported internal trade and continues to play a role in water transport and regional development.